Literature DB >> 18239237

Rapid aneuploidy testing (knowing less) versus traditional karyotyping (knowing more) for advanced maternal age: what would be missed, who should decide?

W C Leung1, E T Lau, W L Lau, Rebecca Tang, Shell Fean Wong, T K Lau, K T Tse, S F Wong, W K To, Lucy K L Ng, T T Lao, Mary H Y Tang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The application of rapid aneuploidy testing as a stand-alone approach in prenatal diagnosis is much debated. The major criticism of this targeted approach is that it will not detect other chromosomal abnormalities that will be picked up by traditional karyotyping. This study aimed to study the nature of such chromosomal abnormalities and whether parents would choose to terminate affected pregnancies.
DESIGN: Retrospective study on a cytogenetic database.
SETTING: Eight public hospitals in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: The karyotype results of 19 517 amniotic fluid cultures performed for advanced maternal age (>or=35 years) from 1997 to 2002 were classified according to whether they were detectable by rapid aneuploidy testing. The outcomes of pregnancies with abnormal karyotypes were reviewed from patient records.
RESULTS: In all, 333 (1.7%) amniotic fluid cultures yielded abnormal karyotypes; 175 (52.6%) of these were detected by rapid aneuploidy testing, and included trisomy 21 (n=94, 28.2%), trisomy 18 or 13 (n=21, 6.3%), and sex chromosome abnormalities (n=60, 18.0%). The other 158 (47.4%) chromosomal abnormalities were not detectable by rapid aneuploidy testing, of which 63 (18.9%) were regarded to be of potential clinical significance and 95 (28.5%) of no clinical significance. Pregnancy outcomes in 327/333 (98.2%) of these patients were retrieved. In total, 143 (42.9%) of these pregnancies were terminated: 93/94 (98.9%) for trisomy 21, 20/21 (95.2%) for trisomy 18 or 13, 19/60 (31.7%) for sex chromosome abnormalities, and 11/63 (17.5%) for other chromosomal abnormalities with potential clinical significance. There were no terminations in the 95 pregnancies in which karyotyping results were regarded to be of no clinical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: 'Knowing less' by the rapid aneuploidy stand-alone testing could miss about half of all chromosomal abnormalities detectable by amniocentesis performed for advanced maternal age. Findings from two fifths of the latter were of potential clinical significance, and the parents chose to terminate one out of six of the corresponding pregnancies. If both techniques are available, parents could have enhanced autonomy to choose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18239237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hong Kong Med J        ISSN: 1024-2708            Impact factor:   2.227


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of QF-PCR as the first approach in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Celia Badenas; Laia Rodríguez-Revenga; Carme Morales; Carmen Mediano; Alberto Plaja; Ma Mar Pérez-Iribarne; Anna Soler; Núria Clusellas; Antoni Borrell; Ma Ángeles Sánchez; Elisabeth Miró; Aurora Sánchez; Montserrat Milà; Wladimiro Jiménez
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Rapid aneuploidy detection or karyotyping? Ethical reflection.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Daniëlle R M Timmermans; Jan M M van Lith; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Advances in prenatal screening: the ethical dimension.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Wybo J Dondorp; Suzanna G M Frints; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  QF-PCR: a valuable first-line prenatal and postnatal test for common aneuploidies in South Africa.

Authors:  Laura Cottino; Venesa Sahibdeen; Maria Mudau; Nakedi Lekgate; Amanda Krause
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  The importance of rapid aneuploidy screening and prenatal diagnosis in the detection of numerical chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Ghada M Elsayed; Lobna El Assiouty; Ezzat S El Sobky
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-09-29

6.  Incidental prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies: health, behavior, and fertility.

Authors:  J J P M Pieters; A J A Kooper; A Geurts van Kessel; D D M Braat; A P T Smits
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12-12

7.  BACs-on-Beads technology: a reliable test for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Sandra García-Herrero; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; José Antonio Martínez-Conejero; Vicente Serra; Inés Olmo; Coral Lara; Carlos Simón; Carmen Rubio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Down syndrome and consanguinity.

Authors:  Amir Akhavan Rezayat; Mohammad Hassanzadeh Nazarabadi; Mohammad Sobhan Sheikh Andalibi; Hossein Mohaddes Ardabili; Maryam Shokri; Salmeh Mirzaie; Lida Jarahi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Correlation between missed abortion and insertional translocation involving chromosomes 1 and 7.

Authors:  Neveen Ashaat; Ahmed Husseiny
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2012-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.