BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In hemimegalencephaly, MR imaging often reveals midsagittal bandlike structures between the 2 lateral ventricles. To determine whether these structures are aberrant midsagittal fibers, we retrospectively reviewed them on conventional MR imaging and prospectively examined them by diffusion tensor MR and fiber tract (FT) reconstruction imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed conventional MR images of 26 consecutive patients with hemimegalencephaly by 2 neuroradiologists, focusing on abnormal midsagittal structures. The distance between the 2 anterior horns and widths of midsagittal bandlike structures were measured. Prospective analysis was performed in 7 consecutive patients with hemimegalencephaly examined for midsagittal aberrant fibers by diffusion tensor imaging, and cortical distribution areas of the fibers were observed. RESULTS: The distance between the 2 anterior horns was wide (>4 mm) due to white matter-intensity structures in 20 of 26 patients (76.9%). Mid-sagittal bandlike structures were observed in 15 patients (57.7%). Asymmetry of the fornices was detected in 7 patients (26.9%), and both fornices were thickened in 7 (26.9%) patients. On FT reconstruction, images showed that 4 of 7 patients with hemimegalencephaly had aberrant midsagittal fibers connecting frontal, occipital, or parietal lobes, bilaterally (n = 3) or ipsilaterally (n = 1). All 4 patients had increased width between the 2 anterior horns, and 3 of them exhibited midsagittal bandlike structures on conventional MR imaging. On the other hand, these MR imaging findings were not noted in 3 patients who did not have aberrant midsagittal fibers on diffusion tensor imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Aberrant midsagittal FTs running intra- or interhemispherically do not infrequently exist in patients with hemimegalencephaly.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In hemimegalencephaly, MR imaging often reveals midsagittal bandlike structures between the 2 lateral ventricles. To determine whether these structures are aberrant midsagittal fibers, we retrospectively reviewed them on conventional MR imaging and prospectively examined them by diffusion tensor MR and fiber tract (FT) reconstruction imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed conventional MR images of 26 consecutive patients with hemimegalencephaly by 2 neuroradiologists, focusing on abnormal midsagittal structures. The distance between the 2 anterior horns and widths of midsagittal bandlike structures were measured. Prospective analysis was performed in 7 consecutive patients with hemimegalencephaly examined for midsagittal aberrant fibers by diffusion tensor imaging, and cortical distribution areas of the fibers were observed. RESULTS: The distance between the 2 anterior horns was wide (>4 mm) due to white matter-intensity structures in 20 of 26 patients (76.9%). Mid-sagittal bandlike structures were observed in 15 patients (57.7%). Asymmetry of the fornices was detected in 7 patients (26.9%), and both fornices were thickened in 7 (26.9%) patients. On FT reconstruction, images showed that 4 of 7 patients with hemimegalencephaly had aberrant midsagittal fibers connecting frontal, occipital, or parietal lobes, bilaterally (n = 3) or ipsilaterally (n = 1). All 4 patients had increased width between the 2 anterior horns, and 3 of them exhibited midsagittal bandlike structures on conventional MR imaging. On the other hand, these MR imaging findings were not noted in 3 patients who did not have aberrant midsagittal fibers on diffusion tensor imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Aberrant midsagittal FTs running intra- or interhemispherically do not infrequently exist in patients with hemimegalencephaly.
Authors: Setsu Wakana; Hangyi Jiang; Lidia M Nagae-Poetscher; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-11-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Seung-Koo Lee; Susumu Mori; Dong Joon Kim; Sei Young Kim; Si Yeon Kim; Dong Ik Kim Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Hao Huang; Jiangyang Zhang; Hangyi Jiang; Setsu Wakana; Lidia Poetscher; Michael I Miller; Peter C M van Zijl; Argye E Hillis; Robert Wytik; Susumu Mori Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-05-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Hangyi Jiang; Peter C M van Zijl; Jinsuh Kim; Godfrey D Pearlson; Susumu Mori Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2006-01-18 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: N Sato; A Yagishita; H Oba; Y Miki; Y Nakata; F Yamashita; K Nemoto; K Sugai; M Sasaki Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Shai Shrot; Misun Hwang; Carl E Stafstrom; Thierry A G M Huisman; Bruno P Soares Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-12-26 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Mariasavina Severino; Ana Filipa Geraldo; Norbert Utz; Domenico Tortora; Ivana Pogledic; Wlodzimierz Klonowski; Fabio Triulzi; Filippo Arrigoni; Kshitij Mankad; Richard J Leventer; Grazia M S Mancini; James A Barkovich; Maarten H Lequin; Andrea Rossi Journal: Brain Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 13.501