Literature DB >> 18237314

Short-term clinical results of Nobel Direct implants: a retrospective multicentre analysis.

Lars Sennerby1, Antonio Rocci, William Becker, Lars Jonsson, Lars-Ake Johansson, Tomas Albrektsson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present retrospective clinical study was undertaken to evaluate the survival rate and marginal bone conditions around Nobel Direct one-piece implants. The purpose was also to compare the results with when these implants are used for immediate/early loading with implants allowed to heal before loading.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-three consecutive patients previously treated with 117 Nobel Direct implants at four different centres were evaluated. The implants had been used in both jaws for treatment after loss of single and multiple teeth. Immediate/early loading (within 2 weeks) with a provisional crown/bridge was applied to 95 implants, while 22 implants healed unloaded for 6 weeks to 6 months before loading. Calculations of marginal bone loss were performed in radiographs taken at placement and after an average of 10.2 months (range 1-18 months) of loading.
RESULTS: Six (5.1%) of the 117 implants were removed during the follow up. All failed implants belonged to the immediate/early loading group giving a failure rate of 6.3% for this group and 0% for two-stage implants. The failure rate was higher for flapless (7.9%) than for flap surgery (0%). The marginal bone loss was -2.4 mm (SD 1.5) for all implants, while 37.6% showed more than 3 mm of loss during the follow up. Bone loss increased with time of follow up. Implants subjected to immediate/early loading showed more bone loss than two-stage implants: -2.6 mm (SD 1.5) vs. -1.6 mm (SD 1.1). Moreover, 41.3% of immediately loaded and 22.7% of two-stage implants presented with more than 3 mm of bone loss.
CONCLUSIONS: This short-term retrospective analysis showed a poor clinical outcome of Nobel Direct implants. Extensive marginal bone loss (>3 mm) was found around more than 1/3 of the implants evaluated. Less resorption and no failures were experienced when implants were allowed to heal from 6 weeks to 6 months before occlusal loading. Within the limitations of the present study design, data indicate that immediate loading, the use of this implant for multi-unit constructions and flapless surgery are risk factors for failure of Nobel Direct implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18237314     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01410.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  Photoelastic stress analysis in prosthetic implants of different diameters: mini, narrow, standard or wide.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Alves Aldiéris Pesqueira; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; Marcela Filié Haddad; Amália Moreno
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

Review 2.  Flapless dental implant surgery and use of cone beam computer tomography guided surgery.

Authors:  D P Laverty; J Buglass; A Patel
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  In vivo Comparison of Crestal Bone Heights Following Implant Placement with "Flapless" and "Flap" Techniques in the Sites of Early Loaded Implants.

Authors:  Suhani Kukreja Pahuja; Pooja Negi; Anjali Singh; Gangesh Bahadur Singh; Deepa Rayast; Manisha Minz
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

4.  Flapless versus conventional flapped dental implant surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Tomas Albrektsson; Ann Wennerberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  One-Piece Titanium Implants: Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Gunar Wagner; Dieter Hartung
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2021-04-08

Review 6.  Periodontio-integrated implants: A revolutionary concept.

Authors:  Minkle Gulati; Vishal Anand; Vivek Govila; Nikil Jain; Pavitra Rastogi; Rohit Bahuguna; Bhargavi Anand
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-03

Review 7.  Dental Implants Inserted in Fresh Extraction Sockets versus Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Ibrahim; Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.