Literature DB >> 18236646

The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults.

Larry E Humes1.   

Abstract

In this review of recent studies from our laboratory at Indiana University, it is argued that audibility is the primary contributor to the speech-understanding difficulties of older adults in unaided listening, but that other factors, especially cognitive factors, emerge when the role of audibility has been minimized. The advantages and disadvantages of three basic approaches used in our laboratory to minimize the role of audibility are examined. The first of these made use of clinical fits of personal amplification devices, but generally failed to make the aided speech stimuli sufficiently audible for the listeners. As a result, hearing loss remained the predominant predictor of performance. The second approach made use of raised and spectrally shaped stimuli with identical shaping applied for all listeners. The third approach used spectrally shaped speech that ensured audibility (at least 10 dB sensation level) of the stimuli up to at least 4000 Hz for each individual listener. With few exceptions, the importance of cognitive factors was revealed once the speech stimuli were made sufficiently audible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18236646     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.18.7.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  90 in total

1.  Auditory temporal-order processing of vowel sequences by young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Larry E Humes; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Psychometric Functions of Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Joanna Perkins; Emily Eilers
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Intelligibility of interrupted sentences at subsegmental levels in young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Jae Hee Lee; Diane Kewley-Port
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Chelsea Bates; Michael S Harris; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Development and efficacy of a frequent-word auditory training protocol for older adults with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Matthew H Burk; Lauren E Strauser; Dana L Kinney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effect of initial-consonant intensity on the speed of lexical decisions.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Allen A Montgomery; Kimberlee A Crass
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.