Literature DB >> 1823536

Comparison of the effects of semi-occlusive polyurethane dressings and hydrocolloid dressings on dermal repair: 1. Cellular changes.

S R Young1, M Dyson, R Hickman, S Lang, C Osborn.   

Abstract

The effects on dermal repair of two wound dressings, one the semi-occlusive polyurethane sheet Opsite, the other the hydrocolloid Granuflex, were compared in full-thickness excised lesions on porcine skin during the period from 5 d to 6 months after injury. Quantitative studies were made of changes in the populations of polymorphonuclear leucocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. The progress of repair in the wounds covered with the semi-occlusive dressing showed a decrease in the number of inflammatory cells (polymorphonuclear leukocytes and macrophages) from 5 to 60 d, whereas the number of proliferative phase cells (fibroblasts and endothelial cells) increased from 5 to 7 d. The total cellularity per unit area showed an increase between 5 and 7 d, that is, during the proliferative phase of repair, and then progressively decreased as the proliferative phase was succeeded by the remodeling phase. In contrast, the repair process in the hydrocolloid-dressed wounds was more complex. The number of inflammatory cells remained relatively high throughout and there were consistently fewer endothelial cells present throughout. Fibroblast number showed an initial fall from 5 to 14 d but then started to increase in number from 21 to 60 d. This chronic inflammatory reaction appeared to be in response to particulate matter that had been incorporated into the wound bed and hypodermis, and was still apparent 6 months after injury, when hydrocolloid particles were detectable microscopically in the hypodermis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1823536     DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12481927

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN: 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


  6 in total

1.  Tissue reactions induced by hydrocolloid wound dressings.

Authors:  M D Leek; Y M Barlow
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Extending the limits of fingertip composite grafting with moist-exposed dressing.

Authors:  Daegu Son; Kihwan Han; David W Chang
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Wound management: the occlusive dressing.

Authors:  S B Rheinecker
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Comparison of the effects of selected dressings on the healing of standardized abrasions.

Authors:  E E Claus; C F Fusco; T Ingram; C D Ingersoll; J E Edwards; T J Melham
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Management of sports-induced skin wounds.

Authors:  D T Foster; L J Rowedder; S K Reese
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Effects of honeybee (Apis mellifera) venom on keratinocyte migration in vitro.

Authors:  Sang Mi Han; Kwan Kyu Park; Young Mee Nicholls; Nicola Macfarlane; Greig Duncan
Journal:  Pharmacogn Mag       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.085

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.