Literature DB >> 18232645

Effect of single-site charge-reversal mutations on the catalytic properties of yeast cytochrome c peroxidase: evidence for a single, catalytically active, cytochrome c binding domain.

Naw May Pearl1, Timothy Jacobson, Cassandra Meyen, Anthony G Clementz, Esther Y Ok, Eric Choi, Kyle Wilson, Lidia B Vitello, James E Erman.   

Abstract

Forty-six charge-reversal mutants of yeast cytochrome c peroxidase (CcP) have been constructed in order to determine the effect of localized charge on the catalytic properties of the enzyme. The mutants include the conversion of all 20 glutamate residues and 24 of the 25 aspartate residues in CcP, one at a time, to lysine residues. In addition, two positive-to-negative charge-reversal mutants, R31E and K149D, are included in the study. The mutants have been characterized by absorption spectroscopy and hydrogen peroxide reactivity at pH 6.0 and 7.5 and by steady-state kinetic studies using recombinant yeast iso-1 ferrocytochrome c (C102T) as substrate at pH 7.5. Many of the charge-reversal mutations cause detectable changes in the absorption spectrum of the enzyme reflecting increased amounts of hexacoordinate heme compared to wild-type CcP. The increase in hexacoordinate heme in the mutant enzymes correlates with an increase in H 2O 2-inactive enzyme. The maximum velocity of the mutants decreases with increasing hexacoordination of the heme group. Steady-state velocity studies indicate that 5 of the 46 mutations (R31E, D34K, D37K, E118K, and E290K) cause large increases in the Michaelis constant indicating a reduced affinity for cytochrome c. Four of the mutations occur within the cytochrome c binding site identified in the crystal structure of the 1:1 complex of yeast cytochrome c and CcP [Pelletier, H., and Kraut, J. (1992) Science 258, 1748-1755] while the fifth mutation site lies outside, but near, the crystallographic site. These data support the hypothesis that the CcP has a single, catalytically active cytochrome c binding domain, that observed in the crystal structures of the cytochrome c/CcP complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18232645     DOI: 10.1021/bi702271r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  9 in total

1.  Enzymatic Mechanism of Leishmania major Peroxidase and the Critical Role of Specific Ionic Interactions.

Authors:  Georges Chreifi; Scott A Hollingsworth; Huiying Li; Sarvind Tripathi; Anton P Arce; Hugo I Magaña-Garcia; Thomas L Poulos
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Apolar distal pocket mutants of yeast cytochrome c peroxidase: hydrogen peroxide reactivity and cyanide binding of the TriAla, TriVal, and TriLeu variants.

Authors:  Anil K Bidwai; Cassandra Meyen; Heather Kilheeney; Damian Wroblewski; Lidia B Vitello; James E Erman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-09-25

3.  Photoinitiated singlet and triplet electron transfer across a redesigned [myoglobin, cytochrome b5] interface.

Authors:  Judith M Nocek; Amanda K Knutson; Peng Xiong; Nadia Petlakh Co; Brian M Hoffman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Cytochrome c signalosome in mitochondria.

Authors:  Irene Díaz-Moreno; José M García-Heredia; Antonio Díaz-Quintana; Miguel A De la Rosa
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 5.  Another look at the interaction between mitochondrial cytochrome c and flavocytochrome b (2).

Authors:  Florence Lederer
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Electrostatic redesign of the [myoglobin, cytochrome b5] interface to create a well-defined docked complex with rapid interprotein electron transfer.

Authors:  Peng Xiong; Judith M Nocek; Amanda K K Griffin; Jingyun Wang; Brian M Hoffman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Efficient Encounter Complex Formation and Electron Transfer to Cytochrome c Peroxidase with an Additional, Distant Electrostatic Binding Site.

Authors:  Antonella Di Savino; Johannes M Foerster; Thijmen La Haye; Anneloes Blok; Monika Timmer; G Matthias Ullmann; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  The Charge Distribution on a Protein Surface Determines Whether Productive or Futile Encounter Complexes Are Formed.

Authors:  Antonella Di Savino; Johannes M Foerster; G Matthias Ullmann; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Enhancing the population of the encounter complex affects protein complex formation efficiency.

Authors:  Antonella Di Savino; Johannes M Foerster; G Matthias Ullmann; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 5.622

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.