Literature DB >> 18230471

On the comparison of interpolation methods.

E Maeland1.   

Abstract

A study of different cubic interpolation kernels in the frequency domain is presented that reveals novel aspects of both cubic spline and cubic convolution interpolation. The kernel used in cubic convolution is of finite support and depends on a parameter to be chosen at will. At the Nyquist frequency, the spectrum attains a value that is independent of this parameter. Exactly the same value is found at the Nyquist frequency in the cubic spline interpolation. If a strictly positive interpolation kernel is of importance in applications, cubic convolution with the parameter value zero is recommended.

Year:  1988        PMID: 18230471     DOI: 10.1109/42.7784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  8 in total

1.  Research on interpolation methods in medical image processing.

Authors:  Mei-Sen Pan; Xiao-Li Yang; Jing-Tian Tang
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Respiratory acoustic thoracic imaging (RATHI): assessing deterministic interpolation techniques.

Authors:  S Charleston-Villalobos; S Cortés-Rubiano; R González-Camarena; G Chi-Lem; T Aljama-Corrales
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Interpolation-based super-resolution reconstruction: effects of slice thickness.

Authors:  Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Nasser H Kashou
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-12-25

4.  Network mapping of the conformational heterogeneity of SOD1 by deploying statistical cluster analysis of FTIR spectra.

Authors:  Sourav Chowdhury; Sagnik Sen; Amrita Banerjee; Vladimir N Uversky; Ujjwal Maulik; Krishnananda Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  High-speed spectral domain optical coherence tomography using non-uniform fast Fourier transform.

Authors:  Kenny K H Chan; Shuo Tang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Evaluation of interpolation effects on upsampling and accuracy of cost functions-based optimized automatic image registration.

Authors:  Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Nasser H Kashou
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2013-08-01

7.  Automatic optimal filament segmentation with sub-pixel accuracy using generalized linear models and B-spline level-sets.

Authors:  Xun Xiao; Veikko F Geyer; Hugo Bowne-Anderson; Jonathon Howard; Ivo F Sbalzarini
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Medical Image Magnification Based on Original and Estimated Pixel Selection Models.

Authors:  Akbarzadeh O; Khosravi M R; Khosravi B; Halvaee P
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-06-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.