Sally S Dickerson1, Peggy J Mycek, Frank Zaldivar. 1. Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine 92697-7085, USA. sdickers@uci.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent research has supported the premise that performance conditions characterized by social-evaluative threat, in which an aspect of the self could be judged by others, are associated with cortisol responses. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is due to negative social evaluation per se or simply the presence of another during a performance situation. METHOD: In the present study, 89 undergraduates delivered a speech in 1 of 3 conditions: in front of anevaluative audience panel (social-evaluative threat [SET]), in the presence of an inattentive confederate (PRES), or alone in a room (non-SET). RESULTS: Consistent with hypotheses, participants in the SET condition demonstrated a significant cortisol response, while those in the non-SET and PRES conditions did not show increases in this hormone. Further, participants in the SET condition who reported greater posttask levels of self-conscious cognitions and emotions demonstrated the greatest increases in cortisol. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the mere social presence of others is not driving the changes in cortisol observed under social-evaluative threat; instead, explicit negative social evaluation may be responsible for increases in this health-relevant physiological parameter.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Recent research has supported the premise that performance conditions characterized by social-evaluative threat, in which an aspect of the self could be judged by others, are associated with cortisol responses. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is due to negative social evaluation per se or simply the presence of another during a performance situation. METHOD: In the present study, 89 undergraduates delivered a speech in 1 of 3 conditions: in front of an evaluative audience panel (social-evaluative threat [SET]), in the presence of an inattentive confederate (PRES), or alone in a room (non-SET). RESULTS: Consistent with hypotheses, participants in the SET condition demonstrated a significant cortisol response, while those in the non-SET and PRES conditions did not show increases in this hormone. Further, participants in the SET condition who reported greater posttask levels of self-conscious cognitions and emotions demonstrated the greatest increases in cortisol. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the mere social presence of others is not driving the changes in cortisol observed under social-evaluative threat; instead, explicit negative social evaluation may be responsible for increases in this health-relevant physiological parameter.
Authors: Aoife O'Donovan; A Janet Tomiyama; Jue Lin; Eli Puterman; Nancy E Adler; Margaret Kemeny; Owen M Wolkowitz; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Elissa S Epel Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Daniel Sznycer; John Tooby; Leda Cosmides; Roni Porat; Shaul Shalvi; Eran Halperin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jenny M Phan; Ekaterina Schneider; Jeremy Peres; Olga Miocevic; Vanessa Meyer; Elizabeth A Shirtcliff Journal: Horm Behav Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 3.587
Authors: Christopher du Plooy; Kevin G F Thomas; Michelle Henry; Robyn Human; W Jake Jacobs Journal: Metab Brain Dis Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 3.584