Literature DB >> 18229481

A test of two different revelation effects using forced-choice recognition.

Jennifer C Major1, Wuliam E Hockley.   

Abstract

The revelation effect refers to the finding of an increased propensity to classify recognition test probes as old when they are preceded by a problem solving task. Recent research indicates that revelation effects are dissociable based on whether the revelation task involves an item that is the same as o rdifferent than th esubsequently presented recognition probe. Using a two-alternative forced-choice design, we found a revelation effect for both words (Experiment 1) and nonwords (Experiment 2) in the condition where the revealed item was the same as the target item (same revelation condition), but no effect when the revealed item was different than either test alternative (different revelation condition). These results were replicated using a mixed list design containing both words and nonwords (Experiment 3). Results support Verde and Rotello's (2004) two-factor account of the revelation effect, which proposes that changes in memory sensitivity underlie revelation effects in the same revelation condition, and that changes in the decision criterion are responsible in the different revelation condition.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18229481     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  19 in total

1.  The electrophysiology of incidental and intentional retrieval: ERP old/new effects in lexical decision and recognition memory.

Authors:  T Curran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Recollection-based recognition eliminates the revelation effect in memory.

Authors:  D L Westerman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

3.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; L D Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  T Curran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

5.  ROC curves show that the revelation effect is not a single phenomenon.

Authors:  Michael F Verde; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

6.  A decrement-to-familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory.

Authors:  J L Hicks; R L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The revelation effect: when disguising test items induces recognition.

Authors:  M J Watkins; Z F Peynircioglu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  On the generality of the revelation effect.

Authors:  D L Westerman; R L Greene
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation.

Authors:  D L Westerman; R L Greene
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Recollective experience in the revelation effect: separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  D C LeCompte
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-05
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The revelation effect: A meta-analytic test of hypotheses.

Authors:  André Aßfalg; Daniel M Bernstein; William Hockley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.