Literature DB >> 18227962

Relevance of polymeric matrix enzymes during biofilm formation.

Anna M Romaní1, Katharina Fund, Joan Artigas, Thomas Schwartz, Sergi Sabater, Ursula Obst.   

Abstract

Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) contribute to biofilm stability and adhesion properties. The EPS matrix might also be a site for free extracellular enzyme activity; however, little is known about participation of enzyme activity in EPS during biofilm formation. In this study, we analyzed the activities of beta-glucosidase, leu-aminopeptidase, and beta-glucosaminidase during the colonization of artificial substrata (glass tiles) in a stream distinguishing enzyme activity in EPS matrix (matrix-enzymes) and total biofilm extracellular enzyme activity. The 1-h incubation of a biofilm suspension and cation-exchange resin followed by centrifugation seems appropriate to extract the matrix fraction (supernatant) and measure matrix enzymes (including free and linked to EPS) in freshwater biofilms, although there is a methodological limitation for using a biofilm suspension instead of an undisrupted biofilm. Total biofilm activities and matrix-enzyme activities showed similar capabilities to decompose organic matter compounds, with a greater capacity for peptide decomposition (leu-aminopeptidase) than for polysaccharides (beta-glucosidase), and a low decomposition of chitin and peptidoglycan (beta-glucosaminidase). Matrix-enzyme activity increased with colonization time, but more slowly than that of total enzyme activity. At the beginning of the colonization experiment (days 1-4) matrix enzymes accounted for 65-81% of total biofilm enzyme activity. Higher proportion of polysaccharides in EPS versus total biofilm, and higher matrix-enzyme activities per microgram of polysaccharides in the EPS were measured during the first 1-3 days of biofilm formation, indicating a high rate of enzyme release into the matrix during this period. Relative contribution of matrix-enzyme activities decreased as biofilm matures, but was maintained at 13-37% of total enzyme activity at the 42- to 49-day-old biofilm. These enzymes, retained and conserved in the EPS, may contribute to community metabolism. When analyzing extracellular enzymes in biofilms, the contribution of matrix enzymes must be considered, especially for young biofilms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18227962     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-007-9361-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  13 in total

1.  New spatially explicit method for detecting extracellular protease activity in biofilms.

Authors:  S N Francoeur; R G Wetzel; R K Neely
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Interrelationships between Rates of Microbial Production, Exopolymer Production, Microbial Biomass, and Sediment Stability in Biofilms of Intertidal Sediments.

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Contributions of microbial biofilms to ecosystem processes in stream mesocosms.

Authors:  Tom J Battin; Louis A Kaplan; J Denis Newbold; Claude M E Hansen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Recalcitrant high-molecular-weight material, an inhibitor of microbial metabolism in river biofilms.

Authors:  C Freeman; M A Lock
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  The biological role of death and lysis in biofilm development.

Authors:  Kenneth W Bayles
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  4-Methylumbelliferyl-beta-N-Acetylglucosaminide Hydrolysis by a High-Affinity Enzyme, a Putative Marker of Protozoan Bacterivory.

Authors:  J Vrba; K Simek; J Nedoma; P Hartman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Biofilms, the customized microniche.

Authors:  J W Costerton; Z Lewandowski; D DeBeer; D Caldwell; D Korber; G James
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Biofilm structure and function and possible implications for riverine DOC dynamics.

Authors:  A M Romaní; H Guasch; I Muñoz; J Ruana; E Vilalta; T Schwartz; F Emtiazi; S Sabater
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2003-12-23       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Enzymatic activity in the activated-sludge floc matrix.

Authors:  B Frølund; T Griebe; P H Nielsen
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1995 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Biodegradability of biofilm extracellular polymeric substances.

Authors:  Xiaoqi Zhang; Paul L Bishop
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.086

View more
  22 in total

1.  Adapting an enzymatic toxicity test to allow comparative evaluation of natural freshwater biofilms' tolerance to metals.

Authors:  Lise C Fechner; Catherine Gourlay-Francé; Emmanuelle Uher; Marie-Hélène Tusseau-Vuillemin
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Low exposure levels of urban metals induce heterotrophic community tolerance: a microcosm validation.

Authors:  Lise C Fechner; Catherine Gourlay-Francé; Marie-Hélène Tusseau-Vuillemin
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 3.  The role of biofilm in the development and dissemination of ubiquitous pathogens in drinking water distribution systems: an overview of surveillance, outbreaks, and prevention.

Authors:  Bahaa A Hemdan; Gamila E El-Taweel; Pranab Goswami; Deepak Pant; Surajbhan Sevda
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 4.  The ecology and biogeochemistry of stream biofilms.

Authors:  Tom J Battin; Katharina Besemer; Mia M Bengtsson; Anna M Romani; Aaron I Packmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  The ecology of heterogeneity: soil bacterial communities and C dynamics.

Authors:  Naoise Nunan; Hannes Schmidt; Xavier Raynaud
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Bacterial cell surface damage due to centrifugal compaction.

Authors:  Brandon W Peterson; Prashant K Sharma; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for control of microbial biofilms: a review.

Authors:  Matheus Aparecido Dos Santos Ramos; Patrícia Bento Da Silva; Larissa Spósito; Luciani Gaspar De Toledo; Bruna Vidal Bonifácio; Camila Fernanda Rodero; Karen Cristina Dos Santos; Marlus Chorilli; Taís Maria Bauab
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-02-27

8.  Analysis of Dissolved Organic Nutrients in the Interstitial Water of Natural Biofilms.

Authors:  Yuki Tsuchiya; Shima Eda; Chiho Kiriyama; Tomoya Asada; Hisao Morisaki
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Formation and characterization of biofilms formed by salt-tolerant yeast strains in seawater-based growth medium.

Authors:  Cecilia Andreu; Marcel Lí Del Olmo; Robert Zarnowski; Hiram Sanchez; David Andes
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry in relation to productivity for freshwater biofilm and plankton communities.

Authors:  Robert L Sinsabaugh; David J Van Horn; Jennifer J Follstad Shah; Stuart Findlay
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.