Literature DB >> 10396212

Estimation of breast volume and its variation during the menstrual cycle using MRI and stereology.

Z Hussain1, N Roberts, G H Whitehouse, M García-Fiñana, D Percy.   

Abstract

Unbiased estimates of breast volume may be obtained in vivo from systematic series of MR images acquired in accordance with the Cavalieri method of modern design-based stereology. The method does not require any assumptions to be made regarding breast shape. If point counting techniques are used to obtain the required breast section areas estimates, 10-15 min analysis (i.e. counting about 250 points on 12 to 16 images) ensures that the contribution of sectioning and point counting to the coefficient of error (CE) on the volume estimate is less than 3%. The methods were applied to measure breast volume in 15 healthy females aged between 22 and 44 years (mean 31.7 years; SD 8.2 years). One subject was studied on every fourth day during two consecutive cycles. The other 14 subjects were studied on three occasions corresponding to menses, ovulation and pre-menses during a single menstrual cycle. Repeat imaging after repositioning on three occasions within a period of 30 min and also at three different times of day for a single subject, both yielded a coefficient of variation (CV) of less than 3% in the estimation of breast volume. ANOVA indicates that there is no significant difference between the mean volume of the left and the right breast (p = 0.294). The mean volume of the left breast is 561 ml (95% confidence interval (CI): 553 ml, 569 ml) and the mean volume of the right breast is 567 ml (95% CI: 559 ml, 576 ml). There are highly significant differences between the three named stages of the menstrual cycle (p < 0.0005), whereby the mean volume at ovulation is 5.5% less than the mean volume at menses (95% CI: 3.0%, 7.9%) and the mean volume pre-menses is 8.1% greater than the mean volume at menses (95% CI: 5.3%, 10.9%). Overall, the volume of each breast varies by an average of 76 ml (95% CI: 61 ml, 92 ml) during the menstrual cycle, which corresponds to 13.6% of the volume at menses (95% CI: 13.3%, 13.8%). No significant interaction was found between the relative volumes of the left and right breast and the stage of the menstrual cycle (p = 0.277), nor between subjects and stages of cycle (p = 0.296). However, a significant interaction was observed between the volume of the left and right breasts in different subjects (p < 0.005). The average difference in the volume of the left and right breasts of all 15 subjects is 39.7 ml (95% CI: 21.3 ml, 58.1 ml), which is 7% of average breast volume and approximately 50% of the average variation in the volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10396212     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.72.855.10396212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  17 in total

1.  Anatomical, physiological and metabolic changes with gestational age during normal pregnancy: a database for parameters required in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling.

Authors:  Khaled Abduljalil; Penny Furness; Trevor N Johnson; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Hora Soltani
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Contrast enhancement kinetics of normal breast parenchyma in dynamic MR mammography: effects of menopausal status, oral contraceptives, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.

Authors:  Katrin Hegenscheid; Carsten O Schmidt; Rebecca Seipel; René Laqua; Ralf Ohlinger; Norbert Hosten; Ralf Puls
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Menstrual cycle-related fluctuations in breast density measured by using three-dimensional MR imaging.

Authors:  Siwa Chan; Min-Ying L Su; Fu-Ju Lei; Jia-Pei Wu; Muqing Lin; Orhan Nalcioglu; Stephen A Feig; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The relationship of breast density in mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in high-risk women and women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Marissa Albert; Freya Schnabel; Jennifer Chun; Shira Schwartz; Jiyon Lee; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Linda Moy
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 1.605

5.  Breast density assessment in adolescent girls using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a feasibility study.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Serghei Malkov; Bo Fan; Aurelie Laidevant; Rachel Novotny; Gertraud Maskarinec
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Response of bilateral breasts to the endogenous hormonal fluctuation in a menstrual cycle evaluated using 3D MRI.

Authors:  Jeon-Hor Chen; Siwa Chan; Dah-Cherng Yeh; Peter T Fwu; Muqing Lin; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Assessment of Background Parenchymal Enhancement and Lesion Kinetics in Breast MRI of BRCA 1/2 Mutation Carriers Compared to Matched Controls Using Quantitative Kinetic Analysis.

Authors:  Alana A Lewin; Sungheon Gene Kim; James S Babb; Amy N Melsaether; Jason McKellop; Melanie Moccaldi; Ana Paula Klautau Leite; Linda Moy
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  The impact of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue.

Authors:  E R Price; J D Brooks; E J Watson; S B Brennan; E A Comen; E A Morris
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Breast size and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Joel G Ray; Anshu P Mohllajee; Rob M van Dam; Karin B Michels
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Optical measurement of dimensional parameters of the breast with subjects in prone position.

Authors:  Ann-Christin Roessler; Felix Althoff; Florian Jaeger; Willi Kalender; Evelyn Wenkel
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.