Literature DB >> 18223447

Evaluation of the Harmony soundprocessor in combination with the speech coding strategy HiRes 120.

Martina Brendel1, Andreas Buechner, Beate Krueger, Carolin Frohne-Buechner, Thomas Lenarz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Advanced Bionics Harmony BTE processor was developed to support the new speech coding strategy HiRes 120 with a resolution of 120 channels based on "current steering." Compared with the previous Auria, the front end has been re-designed and power consumption reduced. STUDY
DESIGN: HiRes 120 as well as the impact of the improved Harmony processing concerning a better speech understanding were evaluated. Subject's performance was evaluated using a test battery of the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser (HSM) sentence test and questionnaires regarding general sound quality, music perception, battery life time and processor handling. PATIENTS: In the first study group, 11 postlingually deafened adult subjects participated with a minimum of 9 months experience. The second study group consisted of 14 postlingually deafened adult subjects with a minimum of 2 years experience.
INTERVENTIONS: Tested were the 2 speech coding strategies HiRes and HiRes 120 on the Harmony and the clinical system, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech perception tests in quiet, in CCITT noise, as well as with a competing talker, questionnaires regarding sound quality and handling and perceptual channel tests.
RESULTS: A total of 84% showed a clear preference for the Harmony processor compared with their previous processor with HiRes. The speech test results showed a 7.7% average increase in the HSM sentence test with 5 dB SNR competing talker.
CONCLUSION: The majority of the subjects wanted to change to the new Harmony processor because of a better understanding in everyday life, handling, and improved battery-life time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18223447     DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31816335c6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  21 in total

1.  [Influence of "novel" speech processors on the speech perception performance of cochlear implant users].

Authors:  I Baljić
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread of excitation using current steering in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jenny L Goehring; Donna L Neff; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Sensitivity of psychophysical measures to signal processor modifications in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Kaibao Nie; Elyse Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Improving virtual channel discrimination in a multi-channel context.

Authors:  Arthi G Srinivasan; Robert V Shannon; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Patricia K Dawson; Lamar Z Borden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Arthi G Srinivasan; David M Landsberger; Robert V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Arthi G Srinivasan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-19       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Postlingual adult performance in noise with HiRes 120 and ClearVoice Low, Medium, and High.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Christine Brenner; Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-05-15

9.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.