PURPOSE: The role of E-cadherin in carcinogenesis is of great interest, but few studies have examined its relevance to pancreatic carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated E-cadherin protein expression by immunohistochemistry in pancreatobiliary cancers having a noncohesive histologic phenotype (21 undifferentiated adenocarcinomas and 7 signet ring carcinomas), comparing the results with pancreatic cancers having a cohesive phenotype (25 moderately differentiated and 14 poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas). RESULTS: Twenty of 21 undifferentiated cancers had complete absence of E-cadherin expression, as did two signet ring carcinomas. In contrast, cohesive cancers (n = 39) had E-cadherin labeling at the plasma membrane (P < 0.001). Subsets of cancers were also evaluated for beta-catenin expression. All of the cohesive lesions (n = 28) showed a membranous beta-catenin expression pattern, whereas noncohesive foci (n = 7) were characterized by either cytoplasmic labeling or complete absence of beta-catenin protein expression, suggestive of a deficient zonula adherens in noncohesive cancers. E-cadherin promoter hypermethylation was observed in an undifferentiated pancreatic cancer cell line, MiaPaCa-2, whereas two pancreatic cancer cell lines derived from differentiated lesions lacked any evidence of E-cadherin promoter methylation. No pattern of E-cadherin promoter methylation could be determined in three primary cancers having mixed histologic patterns (contained both cohesive and noncohesive foci). No somatic mutations in E-cadherin were identified in noncohesive pancreatic cancers having inactivated E-cadherin. CONCLUSIONS: Noncohesive pancreatic cancers were characterized by the loss of E-cadherin protein expression. Promoter hypermethylation is a possible mechanism of E-cadherin gene silencing in a subset of these cancers.
PURPOSE: The role of E-cadherin in carcinogenesis is of great interest, but few studies have examined its relevance to pancreatic carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated E-cadherin protein expression by immunohistochemistry in pancreatobiliary cancers having a noncohesive histologic phenotype (21 undifferentiated adenocarcinomas and 7 signet ring carcinomas), comparing the results with pancreatic cancers having a cohesive phenotype (25 moderately differentiated and 14 poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas). RESULTS: Twenty of 21 undifferentiated cancers had complete absence of E-cadherin expression, as did two signet ring carcinomas. In contrast, cohesive cancers (n = 39) had E-cadherin labeling at the plasma membrane (P < 0.001). Subsets of cancers were also evaluated for beta-catenin expression. All of the cohesive lesions (n = 28) showed a membranous beta-catenin expression pattern, whereas noncohesive foci (n = 7) were characterized by either cytoplasmic labeling or complete absence of beta-catenin protein expression, suggestive of a deficient zonula adherens in noncohesive cancers. E-cadherin promoter hypermethylation was observed in an undifferentiated pancreatic cancer cell line, MiaPaCa-2, whereas two pancreatic cancer cell lines derived from differentiated lesions lacked any evidence of E-cadherin promoter methylation. No pattern of E-cadherin promoter methylation could be determined in three primary cancers having mixed histologic patterns (contained both cohesive and noncohesive foci). No somatic mutations in E-cadherin were identified in noncohesive pancreatic cancers having inactivated E-cadherin. CONCLUSIONS: Noncohesive pancreatic cancers were characterized by the loss of E-cadherin protein expression. Promoter hypermethylation is a possible mechanism of E-cadherin gene silencing in a subset of these cancers.
Authors: A Cano; M A Pérez-Moreno; I Rodrigo; A Locascio; M J Blanco; M G del Barrio; F Portillo; M A Nieto Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: S A Hahn; M Schutte; A T Hoque; C A Moskaluk; L T da Costa; E Rozenblum; C L Weinstein; A Fischer; C J Yeo; R H Hruban; S E Kern Journal: Science Date: 1996-01-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: J R Graff; J G Herman; R G Lapidus; H Chopra; R Xu; D F Jarrard; W B Isaacs; P M Pitha; N E Davidson; S B Baylin Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1995-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: M H Tan; N J Nowak; R Loor; H Ochi; A A Sandberg; C Lopez; J W Pickren; R Berjian; H O Douglass; T M Chu Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 1986 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: George J Arnaoutakis; Deepa Rangachari; Daniel A Laheru; Chris A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Ralph H Hruban; Joseph M Herman; Barish H Edil; Timothy M Pawlik; Richard D Schulick; John L Cameron; Avedis Meneshian; Stephen C Yang; Christopher L Wolfgang Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2011-07-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: David J Shields; Sherry Niessen; Eric A Murphy; Ainhoa Mielgo; Jay S Desgrosellier; Steven K M Lau; Leo A Barnes; Jacqueline Lesperance; Michael Bouvet; David Tarin; Benjamin F Cravatt; David A Cheresh Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-12-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Fieke E M Froeling; Tariq A Mirza; Roger M Feakins; Angela Seedhar; George Elia; Ian R Hart; Hemant M Kocher Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2009-07-16 Impact factor: 4.307