BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clopidogrel and aspirin are antiplatelet medications used in patients intended for endovascular stent placement. Although various studies have investigated individual responsiveness to clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary interventions, there are no studies regarding patients undergoing stent placement of supra-aortic arteries supplying the brain. We analyzed platelet function in a near-patient setting to determine the effects of antiplatelet treatment in neurologic patients and correlated the results with clinical outcome after stent placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The platelet function of 50 consecutive patients scheduled for neuro-interventional stent placement procedures was assessed by using point-of-care testing. All of the patients had symptomatic arteriosclerotic lesions. Clopidogrel effects were tested by impedance aggregometry. Fifty healthy blood donors without clopidogrel medication served as the control group. RESULTS: Reference values for responders and nonresponders were established from the results of the healthy control group. Fourteen (28%) of 50 neurologic patients were stratified as clopidogrel nonresponders. Adverse events were registered in 5 (10%) of 50 patients, 1 of them with a permanent neurologic deficit (1 of 50 [2%]). All 5 of the patients with adverse events were nonresponders. There was a statistically significant correlation between adverse events and clopidogrel nonresponse (Fisher exact test, P = .001). CONCLUSION: A significant rate of clopidogrel nonresponders could be identified in the treated patients. Our data strongly suggest a correlation of insufficient clopidogrel-related platelet inhibition with an increased risk of thromboembolic events in supra-aortic stent placement.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Clopidogrel and aspirin are antiplatelet medications used in patients intended for endovascular stent placement. Although various studies have investigated individual responsiveness to clopidogrel in patients undergoing coronary interventions, there are no studies regarding patients undergoing stent placement of supra-aortic arteries supplying the brain. We analyzed platelet function in a near-patient setting to determine the effects of antiplatelet treatment in neurologicpatients and correlated the results with clinical outcome after stent placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The platelet function of 50 consecutive patients scheduled for neuro-interventional stent placement procedures was assessed by using point-of-care testing. All of the patients had symptomatic arteriosclerotic lesions. Clopidogrel effects were tested by impedance aggregometry. Fifty healthy blood donors without clopidogrel medication served as the control group. RESULTS: Reference values for responders and nonresponders were established from the results of the healthy control group. Fourteen (28%) of 50 neurologicpatients were stratified as clopidogrel nonresponders. Adverse events were registered in 5 (10%) of 50 patients, 1 of them with a permanent neurologic deficit (1 of 50 [2%]). All 5 of the patients with adverse events were nonresponders. There was a statistically significant correlation between adverse events and clopidogrel nonresponse (Fisher exact test, P = .001). CONCLUSION: A significant rate of clopidogrel nonresponders could be identified in the treated patients. Our data strongly suggest a correlation of insufficientclopidogrel-related platelet inhibition with an increased risk of thromboembolic events in supra-aortic stent placement.
Authors: Tomas Jernberg; Christopher D Payne; Kenneth J Winters; Christelle Darstein; John T Brandt; Joseph A Jakubowski; Hideo Naganuma; Agneta Siegbahn; Lars Wallentin Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-04-18 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: F M McKevitt; M S Randall; T J Cleveland; P A Gaines; K T Tan; G S Venables Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Thomas Mueller; Benjamin Dieplinger; Werner Poelz; Andreas Calatzis; Meinhard Haltmayer Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2007-05-07 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: N Flechtenmacher; F Kämmerer; R Dittmer; U Budde; P Michels; J Röther; B Eckert Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Wiebke Kurre; Friedhelm Brassel; Roland Brüning; Jan Buhk; Bernd Eckert; Susanna Horner; Michael Knauth; Thomas Liebig; Jana Maskova; Dirk Mucha; Vojtech Sychra; Matthias Sitzer; Michael Sonnberger; Marc Tietke; Johannes Trenkler; Bernd Turowski; Joachim Berkefeld Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: René Chapot; Hannes Nordmeyer; Markus Heddier; Aglaé Velasco; Petra Schooss; Michael Stauder; Paul Stracke; Pascal J Mosimann Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2013-05-05 Impact factor: 2.804