Literature DB >> 18222627

Mexiletine therapy for chronic pain: survival analysis identifies factors predicting clinical success.

Ian R Carroll1, Kimberly M Kaplan, Sean C Mackey.   

Abstract

Mexiletine, a sodium channel blocker, treats neuropathic pain but its clinical value has been questioned due to its significant side effects and limited efficacy. We hypothesized that ongoing therapy with mexiletine would have limited patient acceptance, but that an analgesic response to intravenous (IV) lidocaine (a pharmacologically similar drug) would identify patients most likely to choose ongoing therapy with mexiletine. We identified a cohort of 37 patients with neuropathic pain who underwent IV lidocaine infusions at our institution and were subsequently prescribed mexiletine. Time until discontinuation of mexiletine was used as the primary endpoint. Time until discontinuation is a clinically relevant, discrete, objective endpoint gaining acceptance as a metric for assessing clinical performance of drugs with significant side effects and limited efficacy. We used the techniques of survival analysis to determine factors that predicted continued therapy with mexiletine. Median time to discontinuation of mexiletine was only 43 days. A stronger analgesic response to IV lidocaine significantly predicted continued acceptance of mexiletine therapy. Decreasing age and male gender also predicted continued acceptance of mexiletine therapy. Analyzing time to mexiletine discontinuation uncovers important limitations in mexiletine's clinical performance missed by studies with conventional endpoints, such as change in pain score. Despite claims of efficacy, acceptance of mexiletine therapy is poor overall. Test infusions with lidocaine identify patients most likely to continue mexiletine therapy. Further work is needed to confirm these results and evaluate the relative acceptance of mexiletine vs. other treatments of neuropathic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18222627      PMCID: PMC2925416          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  11 in total

1.  Local anesthetics for the treatment of neuropathic pain: on the limits of meta-analysis.

Authors:  James P Rathmell; Jane C Ballantyne
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Alzheimer's disease--clinical trials and the logic of clinical purpose.

Authors:  Jason Karlawish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Systemic administration of local anesthetics to relieve neuropathic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ivo W Tremont-Lukats; Vidya Challapalli; Ewan D McNicol; Joseph Lau; Daniel B Carr
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Derivation and cross-validation of pharmacokinetic parameters for computer-controlled infusion of lidocaine in pain therapy.

Authors:  T W Schnider; R Gaeta; W Brose; C F Minto; K M Gregg; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Topical lidocaine patch relieves postherpetic neuralgia more effectively than a vehicle topical patch: results of an enriched enrollment study.

Authors:  B S Galer; M C Rowbotham; J Perander; E Friedman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 6.  Mechanisms of neuropathic pain and their implications for the design of clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael C Rowbotham
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Response to intravenous lidocaine infusion predicts subsequent response to oral mexiletine: a prospective study.

Authors:  B S Galer; J Harle; M C Rowbotham
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Multivariate analysis of chronic pain patients undergoing lidocaine infusions: increasing pain severity and advancing age predict likelihood of clinically meaningful analgesia.

Authors:  Ian Carroll; Raymond Gaeta; Sean Mackey
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Mexiletine and tocainide: a comparison of antiarrhythmic efficacy, adverse effects, and predictive value of lidocaine testing.

Authors:  K T Murray; J T Barbey; H A Kopelman; L A Siddoway; D S Echt; R L Woosley; D M Roden
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Systemic lidocaine in pain due to peripheral nerve injury and predictors of response.

Authors:  N Attal; J Rouaud; L Brasseur; M Chauvin; D Bouhassira
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  6 in total

1.  Design and assessment of a potent sodium channel blocking derivative of mexiletine for minimizing experimental neuropathic pain in several rat models.

Authors:  Robert M Weston; Kamani R Subasinghe; Vasiliki Staikopoulos; Bevyn Jarrott
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 2.  Drug repositioning: playing dirty to kill pain.

Authors:  Leandro Francisco Silva Bastos; Márcio Matos Coelho
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Intravenous lidocaine and mexiletine in the management of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias.

Authors:  Michael J Marmura
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2010-04

4.  Novel insights on diagnosis, cause and treatment of diabetic neuropathy: focus on painful diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Mitra Tavakoli; Omar Asghar; Uazman Alam; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Hassan Fadavi; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 5.  Understanding Neuropathic Corneal Pain--Gaps and Current Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Sunali Goyal; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.975

Review 6.  Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Robert R Edwards; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Martin S Angst; Raymond Dionne; Roy Freeman; Per Hansson; Simon Haroutounian; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Nadine Attal; Ralf Baron; Joanna Brell; Shay Bujanover; Laurie B Burke; Daniel Carr; Amy S Chappell; Penney Cowan; Mila Etropolski; Roger B Fillingim; Jennifer S Gewandter; Nathaniel P Katz; Ernest A Kopecky; John D Markman; George Nomikos; Linda Porter; Bob A Rappaport; Andrew S C Rice; Joseph M Scavone; Joachim Scholz; Lee S Simon; Shannon M Smith; Jeffrey Tobias; Tina Tockarshewsky; Christine Veasley; Mark Versavel; Ajay D Wasan; Warren Wen; David Yarnitsky
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.926

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.