Literature DB >> 18222618

Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of bacteria belonging to the Ochrobactrum-Brucella group by recA and 16S rRNA gene-based comparative sequence analysis.

Holger C Scholz1, Sascha Al Dahouk, Herbert Tomaso, Heinrich Neubauer, Angela Witte, Michael Schloter, Peter Kämpfer, Enevold Falsen, Martin Pfeffer, Marion Engel.   

Abstract

The genetic diversity and phylogenetic interrelationships among 106 Ochrobactrum strains (O. anthropi: 72, O. intermedium: 22, O. tritici: 5, O. oryzae: 2, O. grignonense: 2, O. gallinifaecis: 1, O. lupini: 2), the type strains of the eight Brucella species and other closely related taxa were studied by recA and rrs gene (16S rRNA) comparative sequence analysis. Both markers correctly delineated the various Ochrobactrum species; however, resolution at the subspecies level was considerably higher in the recA gene-based approach. Phylogenetic analyses using neighbor-joining, parsimony, and maximum likelihood algorithms generated trees with similar topologies but the overall branching order, and also the order of the subclades, were not stable in either assay, which could be explained by generally high recA and rrs sequence similarities. Ochrobactrum and Pseudochrobactrum formed separate clades distinct from other Alphaproteobacteria with Bartonella, Agrobacterium, and Rhizobium as the closest relatives. O. gallinifaecis was the most distinct member, when compared to the type species O. anthropi, with rrs and recA similarities of 96.2% and 81.4%. Brucella species were indistinguishable, exhibiting high rrs and recA gene similarities of 98.6% and 85.5% compared with Ochrobactrum intermedium. At the protein level, all RecA sequences among the various Ochrobactrum species and between Ochrobactrum and Brucella were highly similar with only a few amino acid substitutions. O. anthropi and O. tritici were indistinguishable by means of their RecA proteins. A set of initially biochemically classified strains did not cluster within their assigned species and they either grouped within other known species or grouped as potential novel Ochrobactrum species. In further investigations, these strains were reclassified and described as novel species. In summary, Ochrobactrum is a highly diverse genus comprising several novel species. We recommend recA- in addition to rrs gene-analysis for correct species allocation and subtyping of novel Ochrobactrum isolates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18222618     DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2007.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0723-2020            Impact factor:   4.022


  26 in total

1.  Isolation of potentially novel Brucella spp. from frogs.

Authors:  Tobias Eisenberg; Hans-Peter Hamann; Ute Kaim; Karen Schlez; Helga Seeger; Nicole Schauerte; Falk Melzer; Herbert Tomaso; Holger C Scholz; Mark S Koylass; Adrian M Whatmore; Michael Zschöck
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Ribosomal RNA sequence analysis of Brucella infection misidentified as Ochrobactrum anthropi infection.

Authors:  Rebecca T Horvat; Wissam El Atrouni; Kassem Hammoud; Dana Hawkinson; Scott Cowden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Performance and Application of 16S rRNA Gene Cycle Sequencing for Routine Identification of Bacteria in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory.

Authors:  Deirdre L Church; Lorenzo Cerutti; Antoine Gürtler; Thomas Griener; Adrian Zelazny; Stefan Emler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis.

Authors:  Pablo Yagupsky; Pilar Morata; Juan D Colmenero
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Multilocus sequence typing supports the hypothesis that Ochrobactrum anthropi displays a human-associated subpopulation.

Authors:  Sara Romano; Fabien Aujoulat; Estelle Jumas-Bilak; Agnès Masnou; Jean-Luc Jeannot; Enevold Falsen; Hélène Marchandin; Corinne Teyssier
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Genomic comparisons of Brucella spp. and closely related bacteria using base compositional and proteome based methods.

Authors:  Jon Bohlin; Lars Snipen; Axel Cloeckaert; Karin Lagesen; David Ussery; Anja B Kristoffersen; Jacques Godfroid
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Analysis of ten Brucella genomes reveals evidence for horizontal gene transfer despite a preferred intracellular lifestyle.

Authors:  Alice R Wattam; Kelly P Williams; Eric E Snyder; Nalvo F Almeida; Maulik Shukla; A W Dickerman; O R Crasta; R Kenyon; J Lu; J M Shallom; H Yoo; T A Ficht; R M Tsolis; C Munk; R Tapia; C S Han; J C Detter; D Bruce; T S Brettin; Bruno W Sobral; Stephen M Boyle; João C Setubal
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Clinical characteristics of Ochrobactrum anthropi bacteremia.

Authors:  Hideharu Hagiya; Kouhei Ohnishi; Miyako Maki; Naoto Watanabe; Tomoko Murase
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Acquired genetic mechanisms of a multiresistant bacterium isolated from a treatment plant receiving wastewater from antibiotic production.

Authors:  Anna Johnning; Edward R B Moore; Liselott Svensson-Stadler; Yogesh S Shouche; D G Joakim Larsson; Erik Kristiansson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Identification of an unusual Brucella strain (BO2) from a lung biopsy in a 52 year-old patient with chronic destructive pneumonia.

Authors:  Rebekah V Tiller; Jay E Gee; David R Lonsway; Sonali Gribble; Scott C Bell; Amy V Jennison; John Bates; Chris Coulter; Alex R Hoffmaster; Barun K De
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.