Literature DB >> 18221924

Contraceptive efficacy of intrauterine devices.

Patrick F Thonneau1, Thierry Almont, Thierry E Almont.   

Abstract

To compare the contraceptive efficacy of various types of intrauterine devices (IUD; copper devices, Nova-T, intrauterine contraceptive systems, levonorgestrel-releasing devices), we reviewed all relevant publications on this subject that have been published over the last 2 decades. The first point to be highlighted by this review is the excellent effectiveness of IUDs, with a global cumulative pregnancy rate <2% at 5 years, whatever the type of device used. We observed a large variation in efficacy rate according to the type of IUD and also according to study design. Nevertheless, of all the types of IUDs, the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD and to a lesser extent the TCu380A IUD seem to be the most effective, with a cumulative pregnancy rate at 5 years of <0.5% for the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD and between 0.3% and 0.6% for the TCu380A IUD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18221924     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  20 in total

1.  Snippets.

Authors:  Athol Kent
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

2.  Immediate post-abortion insertion of intrauterine contraceptives (IUC) in a diverse urban population.

Authors:  DeShawn Taylor; Shannon Connolly; Sue Ann Ingles; Carey Watson; Penina Segall-Gutierrez
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

Review 3.  First-trimester emergencies: a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Catherine H Phillips; Jeremy R Wortman; Elizabeth S Ginsburg; Aaron D Sodickson; Peter M Doubilet; Bharti Khurana
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-09-25

4.  The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is associated with delayed endocervical clearance of Chlamydia trachomatis without alterations in vaginal microbiota.

Authors:  Emma R Liechty; Ingrid L Bergin; Christine M Bassis; Daniel Chai; William LeBar; Vincent B Young; Jason D Bell
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2015-09-13       Impact factor: 3.166

5.  Comparing Hemorrhages and Dysmenorrhea with Copper T380A and Multiload 375 Intrauterine Devices: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mahnaz Shahnazi; Somayyeh Sarrafi; Mohammad Asgari Jafarabadi; Sahar Azari; Fariba Esmaili
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2014-09-01

Review 6.  Contraception technology: past, present and future.

Authors:  Regine Sitruk-Ware; Anita Nath; Daniel R Mishell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 7.  Contraception for cancer survivors.

Authors:  Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Rachel Hess; James Trussell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Managing women with gestational diabetes mellitus in the postnatal period.

Authors:  Catherine Kim
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 6.577

9.  Review of the safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Authors:  Chandra Kailasam; David Cahill
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: Safety, efficacy, and patient acceptability.

Authors:  Megan N Beatty; Paul D Blumenthal
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.