Literature DB >> 18220898

Nanotopographical control of human osteoprogenitor differentiation.

Matthew J Dalby1, Nikolaj Gadegaard, Adam S G Curtis, Richard O C Oreffo.   

Abstract

Current load-bearing orthopaedic implants are produced in 'bio-inert' materials such as titanium alloys. When inserted into the reamed bone during hip or knee replacement surgery the implants interact with mesenchymal populations including the bone marrow. Bio-inert materials are shielded from the body by differentiation of the cells along the fibroblastic lineage producing scar tissue and inferior healing. This is exacerbated by implant micromotion, which can lead to capsule formation. Thus, next-generation implant materials will have to elicit influence over osteoprogenitor differentiation and mesenchymal populations in order to recruit osteoblastic cells and produce direct bone apposition onto the implant. A powerful method of delivering cues to cells is via topography. Micro-scale topography has been shown to affect cell adhesion, migration, cytoskeleton, proliferation and differentiation of a large range of cell types (thus far all cell types tested have been shown to be responsive to topographical cues). More recent research with nanotopography has also shown a broad range of cell response, with fibroblastic cells sensing down to 10 nm in height. Initial studies with human mesenchymal populations and osteoprogenitor populations have again shown strong cell responses to nanofeatures with increased levels of osteocalcin and osteopontin production from the cells on certain topographies. This is indicative of increased osteoblastic activity on the nanotextured materials. Looking at preliminary data, it is tempting to speculate that progenitor cells are, in fact, more responsive to topography than more mature cell types and that they are actively seeking cues from their environment. This review will investigate the range of nanotopographies available to researchers and our present understanding of mechanisms of progenitor cell response. Finally, it will make some speculations of the future of nanomaterials and progenitor cells in tissue engineering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18220898     DOI: 10.2174/157488807780599220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther        ISSN: 1574-888X            Impact factor:   3.828


  17 in total

Review 1.  Rejuvenating Strategies for Stem Cell-Based Therapies in Aging.

Authors:  Joana Neves; Pedro Sousa-Victor; Heinrich Jasper
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 2.  Nanobiomechanics of living cells: a review.

Authors:  Jinju Chen
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Mechano-topographic modulation of stem cell nuclear shape on nanofibrous scaffolds.

Authors:  Ashwin S Nathan; Brendon M Baker; Nandan L Nerurkar; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Characterization of topographical effects on macrophage behavior in a foreign body response model.

Authors:  Sulin Chen; Jacqueline A Jones; Yongan Xu; Hong-Yee Low; James M Anderson; Kam W Leong
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Direct and indirect effects of microstructured titanium substrates on the induction of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation towards the osteoblast lineage.

Authors:  Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Sharon L Hyzy; Daphne L Hutton; Christopher P Erdman; Marco Wieland; Barbara D Boyan; Zvi Schwartz
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Shaping Cell Fate: Influence of Topographical Substratum Properties on Embryonic Stem Cells.

Authors:  Sarita Kumari; Steven Vermeulen; Ben van der Veer; Aurélie Carlier; Jan de Boer; Deepa Subramanyam
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 7.  Nanotopography-guided tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Hong Nam Kim; Alex Jiao; Nathaniel S Hwang; Min Sung Kim; Do Hyun Kang; Deok-Ho Kim; Kahp-Yang Suh
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  Embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells: understanding, creating, and exploiting the nano-niche for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Emmajayne Kingham; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Biofunctionalization of a titanium surface with a nano-sawtooth structure regulates the behavior of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Wenjie Zhang; Zihui Li; Yan Liu; Dongxia Ye; Jinhua Li; Lianyi Xu; Bin Wei; Xiuli Zhang; Xuanyong Liu; Xinquan Jiang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-08-13

10.  Current practicality of nanotechnology in dentistry. Part 1: Focus on nanocomposite restoratives and biomimetics.

Authors:  Scott A Saunders
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2009-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.