Literature DB >> 18217845

Dual-task interference is greater in delayed grasping than in visually guided grasping.

Anthony Singhal1, Jody C Culham, Eris Chinellato, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

Previous kinematic research suggests that visually guided grasping employs an accurate real-time control system in the dorsal stream, whereas delayed grasping relies on less accurate stored information derived by the perceptual system in the ventral stream. We explored these ideas in two experiments combining visually guided and delayed grasping with auditory tasks involving perception-based imagery and semantic memory. In both experiments, participants were cued to grasp three-dimensional objects of varying sizes. During visually guided trials, objects were visible during the interval between the cue and movement onset. During delayed trials, objects were occluded at the time of the cue. In Experiment 1, the second task required participants to listen to object names and vocally respond if the objects were of a particular shape. In Experiment 2, participants studied a paired-associates list prior to testing and then performed cued recall while grasping. The results of these experiments showed that there was reciprocal interference on both tasks, which was consistently greater during delayed grasping. Experiment 2 showed that the introduction of the second task resulted in larger grip apertures during delayed grasping. This supports the idea that delayed grasping involves processing of stored perception-based information that shares resources with cross-modal tasks involving imagery and memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18217845     DOI: 10.1167/7.5.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

1.  Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of cognitive functions and behavioral context on grasping kinematics.

Authors:  Fabian Steinberg; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A perception-based ERP reveals that the magnitude of delay matters for memory-guided reaching.

Authors:  Leanna C Cruikshank; Jeremy B Caplan; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  The role of cue-response mapping in motorvisual impairment and facilitation: evidence for different roles of action planning and action control in motorvisual dual-task priming.

Authors:  Roland Thomaschke; Brian Hopkins; R Christopher Miall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Neural markers of automatic and controlled attention during immediate and delayed action.

Authors:  Graeme A B Armstrong; Anthony Singhal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Visual and linguistic cues to graspable objects.

Authors:  Andriy Myachykov; Rob Ellis; Angelo Cangelosi; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Hear speech, change your reach: changes in the left-hand grasp-to-eat action during speech processing.

Authors:  Nicole A van Rootselaar; Jason W Flindall; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cognitive-motor interference while grasping, lifting and holding objects.

Authors:  Erwan Guillery; André Mouraux; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.