BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to determine the prevalence of extracardiac findings discovered during multidetector computed tomography (CT) (MDCT) examinations before atrial fibrillation ablation. Multidetector CT has become a valuable tool in detailing left atrial anatomy before catheter ablation. The incidence of extracardiac findings has been reported for electron beam CT calcium scoring and coronary MDCT, but no data exist for the prevalence of extracardiac findings discovered before atrial fibrillation ablation with MDCT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical reports from MDCT examinations before atrial fibrillation ablation and interpretations by 2 radiologists blinded to the clinical reports were reviewed for significant additional extracardiac findings and recommendations for follow-up. In 149 patients who underwent MDCT, the mean age was 55.9 +/- 11.0 years, 75% were men, and 47% had a history of smoking. Extracardiac findings were identified in 69% of patients with clinical, 90% of reader 1, and 97% of reader 2 interpretations (kappa = 0.086). Follow-up was recommended in 30% of clinical, 50% of reader 1, and 38% of reader 2 interpretations (kappa = 0.408). Pulmonary nodules were the most common additional finding and reason for suggested follow-up for all interpreters. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of extracardiac abnormalities detected by MDCT is considerable. Significant variability in their identification exists between interpreters, but there is good agreement about the need for further follow-up. It is important that those who interpret these examinations are adequately trained in the identification and interpretation of both cardiac and extracardiac findings.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to determine the prevalence of extracardiac findings discovered during multidetector computed tomography (CT) (MDCT) examinations before atrial fibrillation ablation. Multidetector CT has become a valuable tool in detailing left atrial anatomy before catheter ablation. The incidence of extracardiac findings has been reported for electron beam CT calcium scoring and coronary MDCT, but no data exist for the prevalence of extracardiac findings discovered before atrial fibrillation ablation with MDCT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinical reports from MDCT examinations before atrial fibrillation ablation and interpretations by 2 radiologists blinded to the clinical reports were reviewed for significant additional extracardiac findings and recommendations for follow-up. In 149 patients who underwent MDCT, the mean age was 55.9 +/- 11.0 years, 75% were men, and 47% had a history of smoking. Extracardiac findings were identified in 69% of patients with clinical, 90% of reader 1, and 97% of reader 2 interpretations (kappa = 0.086). Follow-up was recommended in 30% of clinical, 50% of reader 1, and 38% of reader 2 interpretations (kappa = 0.408). Pulmonary nodules were the most common additional finding and reason for suggested follow-up for all interpreters. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of extracardiac abnormalities detected by MDCT is considerable. Significant variability in their identification exists between interpreters, but there is good agreement about the need for further follow-up. It is important that those who interpret these examinations are adequately trained in the identification and interpretation of both cardiac and extracardiac findings.
Authors: Mark A Wood; Michael Wittkamp; Daniel Henry; Robert Martin; J V Nixon; Richard K Shepard; Kenneth A Ellenbogen Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jeffrey G Schragin; Joel L Weissfeld; Daniel Edmundowicz; Diane C Strollo; Carl R Fuhrman Journal: J Thorac Imaging Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: C I Henschke; D I McCauley; D F Yankelevitz; D P Naidich; G McGuinness; O S Miettinen; D Libby; M Pasmantier; J Koizumi; N Altorki; J P Smith Journal: Oncologist Date: 2001
Authors: Koen Nieman; Filippo Cademartiri; Pedro A Lemos; Rolf Raaijmakers; Peter M T Pattynama; Pim J de Feyter Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; Thomas E Hartman; David E Midthun; Jeff A Sloan; Anne-Marie Sykes; Gregory L Aughenbaugh; Medy A Clemens Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-01-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; A Takahashi; M Hocini; G Quiniou; S Garrigue; A Le Mouroux; P Le Métayer; J Clémenty Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tomas G Neilan; Ravi V Shah; Siddique A Abbasi; Hoshang Farhad; John D Groarke; John A Dodson; Otavio Coelho-Filho; Ciaran J McMullan; Bobak Heydari; Gregory F Michaud; Roy M John; Rob van der Geest; Michael L Steigner; Ron Blankstein; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Christian Sohns; Samuel Sossalla; Dirk Vollmann; Lars Luethje; Joachim Seegers; Jan D Schmitto; Markus Zabel; Silvia Obenauer Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-06-13 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Bernard G Jaar; Lili Zhang; Svetlana V Chembrovich; Stephen M Sozio; Tariq Shafi; Julia J Scialla; Gordon F Tomaselli; Joao A C Lima; Wen Hong Linda Kao; Rulan S Parekh; Lucy A Meoni Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 2.388