Literature DB >> 18211941

Spectacle prescribing in childhood: a survey of hospital optometrists.

J E Farbrother1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine the spectacle prescribing practices of hospital optometrists for infants and young children.
METHODS: A two-part survey relating to the prescribing of spectacles for non-strabismic children aged one to five years was distributed to all delegates at the 2006 Annual Hospital Optometrists Conference.
RESULTS: A total of 93 of the 149 optometrists returned the survey. The threshold level at which 50% of the respondents would consider prescribing spectacles in non-strabismic children at ages one, three and five years were for hyperopia 4.50 DS, 3.00 DS and 2.50 DS, for myopia -3.00 DS, -1.50 DS and -1.00 DS, for anisohyperopia 2.00 DS, 1.00 DS and 1.00 DS and for non-oblique astigmatism 2.50 DC, 1.50 DC and 1.00 DC. For hyperopic children in the three to four-year age group at least two thirds of those recommending spectacles would give a partial correction, with an average reduction of 1.69 DS from the cycloplegic refraction.
CONCLUSIONS: Delegates of the Hospital Optometrists Annual Conference recommend spectacles to correct lower levels, on average, of myopia and hyperopia in young children than members of the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus or those suggested in the American Academy of Ophthalmology preferred practice patterns guidelines. There is, however, broad agreement for the management of astigmatism and anisometropia and the prescription of partial corrections in hyperopic children in the absence of strabismus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211941     DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.123497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  7 in total

1.  The accommodative lag of the young hyperopic patient.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Kathryn H Gray; Christy C Hohenbary; Don W Lyon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Hypo-accommodation responses in hypermetropic infants and children.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Correlation between myopic ametropia and stereoacuity in school-aged children in Taiwan.

Authors:  Ju-Wen Yang; Tien-Yi Huang; Jiahn-Shing Lee; Ling Yeung; Yi-Fang Lin; Chi-Chin Sun
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Visual acuity measures do not reliably detect childhood refractive error--an epidemiological study.

Authors:  Lisa O'Donoghue; Alicja R Rudnicka; Julie F McClelland; Nicola S Logan; Kathryn J Saunders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Scope and costs of autorefraction and photoscreening for childhood amblyopia-a systematic narrative review in relation to the EUSCREEN project data.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Helen J Griffiths; Jill Carlton; Paolo Mazzone; Arinder Channa; Mandy Nordmann; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Hyperopia Is Not Causally Associated With a Major Deficit in Educational Attainment.

Authors:  Denis Plotnikov; Nuala A Sheehan; Cathy Williams; Denize Atan; Jeremy A Guggenheim
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  A survey of the criteria for prescribing in cases of borderline refractive errors.

Authors:  Einat Shneor; Bruce John William Evans; Yael Fine; Yehudit Shapira; Liat Gantz; Ariela Gordon-Shaag
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.