Literature DB >> 18211249

Patient registries in cognitive neuroscience research: advantages, challenges, and practical advice.

Lesley K Fellows1, Marianna Stark, Arlene Berg, Anjan Chatterjee.   

Abstract

Neuropsychological work is the historical foundation of cognitive neuroscience and continues to be an important method in the study of the neural basis of human behavior, complementing newer techniques for investigating brain structure-function relationships in human subjects. Recent advances in neuroimaging, statistics and information management provide powerful tools to support neuropsychological research. At the same time, changing ethical requirements and privacy concerns impose increasingly high standards on the procedures used to recruit research participants, and on subsequent data management. Shared, centrally managed research registries provide a framework for facilitating access to this method for nonclinicians, addressing ethical concerns, streamlining recruitment and screening procedures, and coordinating subsequent research contacts and data storage. We report the experience of two such registries: the patient database of the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience at the University of Pennsylvania, and the Cognitive Neuroscience Research Registry at McGill University.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211249     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  18 in total

1.  A model for the design and implementation of a participant recruitment registry for clinical studies of older adults.

Authors:  N Maritza Dowling; Nevin Olson; Thomas Mish; Preethy Kaprakattu; Carey Gleason
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain.

Authors:  Myrna F Schwartz; Daniel Y Kimberg; Grant M Walker; Adelyn Brecher; Olufunsho K Faseyitan; Gary S Dell; Daniel Mirman; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ventromedial frontal lobe damage affects interpretation, not exploration, of emotional facial expressions.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Lesley K Fellows
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Narratives of focal brain injured individuals: A macro-level analysis.

Authors:  Ayşenur Karaduman; Tilbe Göksun; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Ventromedial Frontal Lobe Damage Alters how Specific Attributes are Weighed in Subjective Valuation.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Marcus Sefranek; Lesley K Fellows
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Single-case cognitive neuropsychology in the age of big data.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Simon Fischer-Baum
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Spontaneous gesture and spatial language: Evidence from focal brain injury.

Authors:  Tilbe Göksun; Matthew Lehet; Katsiaryna Malykhina; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Necessary Contributions of Human Frontal Lobe Subregions to Reward Learning in a Dynamic, Multidimensional Environment.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Lesley K Fellows
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Naming and gesturing spatial relations: evidence from focal brain-injured individuals.

Authors:  Tilbe Göksun; Matthew Lehet; Katsiaryna Malykhina; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Similarities and differences between parietal and frontal patients in autobiographical and constructed experience tasks.

Authors:  Marian E Berryhill; Lauren Picasso; Robert Arnold; David Drowos; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.