Literature DB >> 22273586

A model for the design and implementation of a participant recruitment registry for clinical studies of older adults.

N Maritza Dowling1, Nevin Olson, Thomas Mish, Preethy Kaprakattu, Carey Gleason.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The identification and enlistment of suitable participants into clinical studies is often challenging, requiring a large commitment of time and staff resources. The recruitment and retention of populations typically underrepresented in research present additional challenges to enrollment of sufficient numbers of participants in clinical studies. Inadequate participation may undermine the pace and direction of new treatment discoveries.
PURPOSE: Registries of potential research participants are powerful tools to support research by providing a framework to streamline screening and recruitment and to maintain a communication history with potential research participants. The authors present a model for the development and implementation of a web-based database system to support recruitment, enrollment, and retention of potential study participants in close alignment with the goals of the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC).
METHODS: The required data elements and major information domains for the registry were identified using a structured problem-solving and system design approach and the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team of stakeholders. The system performance, utility, and usability were assessed through multiple iterations with the users.
RESULTS: The process-oriented approach culminated in a multifaceted tool that combined contact management and potential research participant registration to assist with the challenges of recruitment and retention in clinical research. A unique feature of the registry design model was its contact management capabilities for efficient tracking of all contacts with registrants. LIMITATIONS: We have focused on the development and implementation of a system for the recruitment of older adults with specific cognitive and medical characteristics. However, our procedures for identifying data needs and database system utility and functionality can be transferred easily to other populations and settings. As with any multipurpose registry database system, careful management and training are essential to optimize efficiency.
CONCLUSION: Adding a contact management element to the registry design significantly improved the efficiency of communication between clinical study coordinators and potential research participants, as well as the communication among coordinators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22273586      PMCID: PMC3325341          DOI: 10.1177/1740774511432555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  19 in total

1.  Primary prevention studies and the healthy elderly: evaluating barriers to recruitment.

Authors:  M Boles; W S Getchell; G Feldman; R McBride; R G Hart
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-08

2.  Random versus volunteer selection for a community-based study.

Authors:  M Ganguli; M E Lytle; M D Reynolds; H H Dodge
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 3.  Effectiveness of strategies to recruit underrepresented populations into cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Jon Tilburt; Shari Bolen; Charles Baffi; Renee F Wilson; Mollie W Howerton; M Chris Gibbons; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass; Jean G Ford
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 4.  Barriers to participation in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Ross; A Grant; C Counsell; W Gillespie; I Russell; R Prescott
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Caregivers' attitudes toward their family members' participation in Alzheimer disease research: implications for recruitment and retention.

Authors:  C M Connell; B A Shaw; S B Holmes; N L Foster
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.703

6.  Recruitment of community-dwelling older adults for nursing research: a challenging process.

Authors:  P Hawranik; V Pangman
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  2002-03

7.  The cost of recruiting Alzheimer's disease caregivers for research.

Authors:  B A Tarlow; D F Mahoney
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2000-11

8.  Involving American Indians and medically underserved rural populations in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Daniel G Petereit; Petra Helbig; David Koop; Patricia Kussman; Emily Fox Dunn; Asha Patnaik
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Recruitment of black elderly for clinical research studies of dementia: the CERAD experience.

Authors:  E L Ballard; F Nash; K Raiford; L E Harrell
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1993-08

10.  What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies.

Authors:  Alison M McDonald; Rosemary C Knight; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; Adrian M Grant; Jonathan A Cook; Diana R Elbourne; David Francis; Jo Garcia; Ian Roberts; Claire Snowdon
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  14 in total

1.  Design, development and deployment of a Diabetes Research Registry to facilitate recruitment in clinical research.

Authors:  Meng H Tan; Steven J Bernstein; Stephen Gendler; David Hanauer; William H Herman
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  GeneMatch: A novel recruitment registry using at-home APOE genotyping to enhance referrals to Alzheimer's prevention studies.

Authors:  Jessica B Langbaum; Jason Karlawish; J Scott Roberts; Elisabeth M Wood; Angela Bradbury; Nellie High; Trisha L Walsh; David Gordon; Raj Aggarwal; Peter Davis; Carter Stowell; Lane Trisko; Carolyn M Langlois; Eric M Reiman; Pierre N Tariot
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 21.566

3.  Recruiting Community-Based Dementia Patients and Caregivers in a Nonpharmacologic Randomized Trial: What Works and How Much Does It Cost?

Authors:  Karen Morrison; Laraine Winter; Laura N Gitlin
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2014-05-04

Review 4.  Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.

Authors:  James R Rogers; Junghwan Lee; Ziheng Zhou; Ying Kuen Cheung; George Hripcsak; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Determining the Suitability of Registries for Embedding Clinical Trials in the United States: A Project of the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.

Authors:  J Stephen Mikita; Jules Mitchel; Nicolle M Gatto; John Laschinger; James E Tcheng; Emily P Zeitler; Arlene S Swern; E Dawn Flick; Christopher Dowd; Theodore Lystig; Sara B Calvert
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 1.778

6.  Obstacles and opportunities in Alzheimer's clinical trial recruitment.

Authors:  Jennifer L Watson; Laurie Ryan; Nina Silverberg; Vicky Cahan; Marie A Bernard
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Centralized registry for COVID-19 research recruitment: Design, development, implementation, and preliminary results.

Authors:  Anna Peeler; Hailey Miller; Oluwabunmi Ogungbe; Cassia Lewis Land; Liz Martinez; Monica Guerrero Vazquez; Scott Carey; Sumati Murli; Megan Singleton; Cyd Lacanienta; Kelly Gleason; Daniel Ford; Cheryl R Himmelfarb
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-07-14

Review 8.  Facilitating Alzheimer disease research recruitment.

Authors:  Joshua D Grill; James E Galvin
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.703

9.  Frontiers: Integration of a Research Participant Registry with Medical Clinic Registration and Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Patricia M Kluding; Jo Denton; T Rene Jamison; William Brooks; Karen Blackwell; John D Lantos; Lemuel R Waitman; Tamara M McMahon; Arvinder Choudhary; Marjorie J Bott; Allen Greiner; Susan Klaus; Amy O'Brien-Ladner; Lauren S Aaronson; Jeffrey Burns; Richard Barohn
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.689

10.  A Survey of Knowledge and Views Concerning Genetic and Amyloid PET Status Disclosure.

Authors:  B R Ott; M A Pelosi; G Tremont; P J Snyder
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2016-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.