BACKGROUND: The identification and enlistment of suitable participants into clinical studies is often challenging, requiring a large commitment of time and staff resources. The recruitment and retention of populations typically underrepresented in research present additional challenges to enrollment of sufficient numbers of participants in clinical studies. Inadequate participation may undermine the pace and direction of new treatment discoveries. PURPOSE: Registries of potential research participants are powerful tools to support research by providing a framework to streamline screening and recruitment and to maintain a communication history with potential research participants. The authors present a model for the development and implementation of a web-based database system to support recruitment, enrollment, and retention of potential study participants in close alignment with the goals of the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC). METHODS: The required data elements and major information domains for the registry were identified using a structured problem-solving and system design approach and the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team of stakeholders. The system performance, utility, and usability were assessed through multiple iterations with the users. RESULTS: The process-oriented approach culminated in a multifaceted tool that combined contact management and potential research participant registration to assist with the challenges of recruitment and retention in clinical research. A unique feature of the registry design model was its contact management capabilities for efficient tracking of all contacts with registrants. LIMITATIONS: We have focused on the development and implementation of a system for the recruitment of older adults with specific cognitive and medical characteristics. However, our procedures for identifying data needs and database system utility and functionality can be transferred easily to other populations and settings. As with any multipurpose registry database system, careful management and training are essential to optimize efficiency. CONCLUSION: Adding a contact management element to the registry design significantly improved the efficiency of communication between clinical study coordinators and potential research participants, as well as the communication among coordinators.
BACKGROUND: The identification and enlistment of suitable participants into clinical studies is often challenging, requiring a large commitment of time and staff resources. The recruitment and retention of populations typically underrepresented in research present additional challenges to enrollment of sufficient numbers of participants in clinical studies. Inadequate participation may undermine the pace and direction of new treatment discoveries. PURPOSE: Registries of potential research participants are powerful tools to support research by providing a framework to streamline screening and recruitment and to maintain a communication history with potential research participants. The authors present a model for the development and implementation of a web-based database system to support recruitment, enrollment, and retention of potential study participants in close alignment with the goals of the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC). METHODS: The required data elements and major information domains for the registry were identified using a structured problem-solving and system design approach and the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team of stakeholders. The system performance, utility, and usability were assessed through multiple iterations with the users. RESULTS: The process-oriented approach culminated in a multifaceted tool that combined contact management and potential research participant registration to assist with the challenges of recruitment and retention in clinical research. A unique feature of the registry design model was its contact management capabilities for efficient tracking of all contacts with registrants. LIMITATIONS: We have focused on the development and implementation of a system for the recruitment of older adults with specific cognitive and medical characteristics. However, our procedures for identifying data needs and database system utility and functionality can be transferred easily to other populations and settings. As with any multipurpose registry database system, careful management and training are essential to optimize efficiency. CONCLUSION: Adding a contact management element to the registry design significantly improved the efficiency of communication between clinical study coordinators and potential research participants, as well as the communication among coordinators.
Authors: Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Jon Tilburt; Shari Bolen; Charles Baffi; Renee F Wilson; Mollie W Howerton; M Chris Gibbons; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass; Jean G Ford Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: B Ashleigh Guadagnolo; Daniel G Petereit; Petra Helbig; David Koop; Patricia Kussman; Emily Fox Dunn; Asha Patnaik Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2009-11-23 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Alison M McDonald; Rosemary C Knight; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; Adrian M Grant; Jonathan A Cook; Diana R Elbourne; David Francis; Jo Garcia; Ian Roberts; Claire Snowdon Journal: Trials Date: 2006-04-07 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Meng H Tan; Steven J Bernstein; Stephen Gendler; David Hanauer; William H Herman Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Jessica B Langbaum; Jason Karlawish; J Scott Roberts; Elisabeth M Wood; Angela Bradbury; Nellie High; Trisha L Walsh; David Gordon; Raj Aggarwal; Peter Davis; Carter Stowell; Lane Trisko; Carolyn M Langlois; Eric M Reiman; Pierre N Tariot Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: J Stephen Mikita; Jules Mitchel; Nicolle M Gatto; John Laschinger; James E Tcheng; Emily P Zeitler; Arlene S Swern; E Dawn Flick; Christopher Dowd; Theodore Lystig; Sara B Calvert Journal: Ther Innov Regul Sci Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 1.778
Authors: Jennifer L Watson; Laurie Ryan; Nina Silverberg; Vicky Cahan; Marie A Bernard Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Patricia M Kluding; Jo Denton; T Rene Jamison; William Brooks; Karen Blackwell; John D Lantos; Lemuel R Waitman; Tamara M McMahon; Arvinder Choudhary; Marjorie J Bott; Allen Greiner; Susan Klaus; Amy O'Brien-Ladner; Lauren S Aaronson; Jeffrey Burns; Richard Barohn Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2015-08-03 Impact factor: 4.689