Literature DB >> 18211248

Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory.

Anna M Woollams1, Jason R Taylor, Frini Karayanidis, Richard N Henson.   

Abstract

The relationship between recognition memory and repetition priming remains unclear. Priming is believed to reflect increased processing fluency for previously studied items relative to new items. Manipulations that affect fluency can also affect the likelihood that participants will judge items as studied in recognition tasks. This attribution of fluency to memory has been related to the familiarity process, as distinct from the recollection process, that is assumed by dual-process models of recognition memory. To investigate the time courses and neural sources of fluency, familiarity, and recollection, we conducted an event-related potential (ERP) study of recognition memory using masked priming of test cues and a remember/know paradigm. During the recognition test, studied and unstudied words were preceded by a brief, masked word that was either the same or different. Participants decided quickly whether each item had been studied ("old" or "new"), and for items called old, indicated whether they "remembered" (R) the encoding event, or simply "knew" (K) the item had been studied. Masked priming increased the proportion of K, but not R, judgments. Priming also decreased response times for hits but not correct rejections (CRs). Four distinct ERP effects were found. A medial-frontal FN400 (300-500 msec) was associated with familiarity (R, K Hits > CRs) and a centro-parietal late positivity (500-800 msec) with recollection (R Hits > K Hits, CRs). A long-term repetition effect was found for studied items judged "new" (Misses > CRs) in the same time window as the FN400, but with a posterior distribution. Finally, a centrally distributed masked priming effect was visible between 150 and 250 msec and continued into the 300-500 msec time window, where it was topographically dissociable from the FN400. These results suggest that multiple neural signals are associated with repetition and potentially contribute to recognition memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18211248     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  26 in total

Review 1.  Brain substrates of implicit and explicit memory: the importance of concurrently acquired neural signals of both memory types.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  A broader view of perirhinal function: from recognition memory to fluency-based decisions.

Authors:  Ilana T Z Dew; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  More than a feeling: Pervasive influences of memory without awareness of retrieval.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Heather D Lucas; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.065

4.  A critical role of the human hippocampus in an electrophysiological measure of implicit memory.

Authors:  Richard James Addante
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Masked repetition priming hinders subsequent recollection but not familiarity: A behavioral and event-related potential study.

Authors:  Bingbing Li; Wei Wang; Chuanji Gao; Chunyan Guo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  An ERP investigation into the strategic regulation of the fluency heuristic during recognition memory.

Authors:  Brian P Kurilla; Brian D Gonsalves
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Dissociation of the electrophysiological correlates of familiarity strength and item repetition.

Authors:  Sarah S Yu; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Electrophysiological distinctions between recognition memory with and without awareness.

Authors:  Philip C Ko; Bryant Duda; Erin P Hussey; Brandon A Ally
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Understanding age-related reductions in visual working memory capacity: examining the stages of change detection.

Authors:  Philip C Ko; Bryant Duda; Erin Hussey; Emily Mason; Robert J Molitor; Geoffrey F Woodman; Brandon A Ally
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Manipulating letter fluency for words alters electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory.

Authors:  Heather D Lucas; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.