Literature DB >> 18209215

Assessment of vertical facial and dentoalveolar changes using panoramic radiography.

Nasila Nohadani1, Sabine Ruf.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to analyse longitudinal vertical facial and dentoalveolar changes using panoramic radiographs (PRs) and to compare the results with measurements on lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCRs) in order to determine whether, under certain circumstances, the radiation dose for a patient may be reduced by taking only a PR instead of a PR and a LCR. Pre- and post-treatment PRs and LCRs of 30 (15 females and 15 males) orthodontically treated adolescents (mean age pre-treatment 10.9 years, post-treatment 13.4 years) were analysed using Pearson's correlation coefficients and gender differences using Fisher's z-transformation. The results revealed that most variables exhibited larger absolute values on PRs than on LCRs. Comparison of dentoskeletal morphology between the LCRs and the PRs revealed moderate to high, mostly statistically significant, interrelations both before and after orthodontic treatment. The lowest correlations were found for the maxillary jaw base angle (NL/H; r= 0.35***) and the highest for the gonial angle (ML/RL; r = 0.90***). However, when assessing the combined growth and treatment changes from before to after treatment, only weak to moderate, not statistically significant, interrelations were found between LCRs and PRs. Anterior face height (AFH; r = 0.43***), the mandibular plane angle (ML/H; r = 0.06*), and the distance of the incisal tip of the most extruded mandibular incisor to the ML-line (ii-ML; r = -0.21*) were the only statistically significant parameters. The average group differences for growth and treatment changes, however, were small for most parameters. Analysis of vertical facial and dentoalveolar parameters on PRs delivers a moderate approximation to the situation depicted on LCRs. However, PRs cannot be recommended for the analysis of individual longitudinal changes in vertical facial and dentoalveolar parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18209215     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  8 in total

1.  Influence of the intergonial distance on image distortion in panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  D B S Ladeira; A D Cruz; S M Almeida; F N Bóscolo
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Dilemma of gonial angle measurement: Panoramic radiograph or lateral cephalogram.

Authors:  Pillai Devu Radhakrishnan; Nilambur Kovilakam Sapna Varma; Vallikat Velath Ajith
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-06-22

3.  Radiographic evaluation of remodeling of mandible in adult South Indian population: Implications in forensic science.

Authors:  Veena Krishnan; L S Sreela; Philips Mathew; Twinkle S Prasad
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2020-06-03

4.  Is There Any Difference Between Gonial Angle Values Measured on Digital Lateral Cephalograms and Orthopantomograms?

Authors:  Demet Kaya
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-05-20

5.  Age and gender correlation of gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects in a dental school in Far North Queensland.

Authors:  Jodi Leversha; Glen McKeough; Adriana Myrteza; Hannah Skjellrup-Wakefiled; Jordan Welsh; Amar Sholapurkar
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-02-01

6.  Comparison of Orthopantomogram and Lateral Cephalogram for Mandibular Measurements.

Authors:  S Saravana Kumar; V Thailavathy; Daya Srinivasan; Divya Loganathan; J Yamini
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2017-11

7.  Agreement between panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs for measuring the gonial angle.

Authors:  Maryam Zangouei-Booshehri; Hossein-Agha Aghili; Mojtaba Abasi; Fatemeh Ezoddini-Ardakani
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 0.212

8.  Assessment of the validity of orthopantomographs in the evaluation of mandibular steepness in Libya.

Authors:  Tayisir Ganeiber; Iman Bugaighis
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-06-06
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.