Literature DB >> 18209151

Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy.

Akushla Wijayanayagam1, Anjali S Kumar, Robert D Foster, Laura J Esserman.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Dissection of subnipple tissue to spare the entire skin envelope of the breast (total skin-sparing mastectomy) is a feasible option in appropriately selected patients and yields an excellent final cosmetic outcome.
DESIGN: Prospective surgical technique outcomes study.
SETTING: University-based breast care referral center. PATIENTS: Total skin-sparing mastectomy with preservation of the nipple-areola complex was performed in 64 breasts in 43 women. Indications for total skin-sparing mastectomy included prophylaxis (n = 29), invasive carcinoma (n = 24), and ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 11).
INTERVENTIONS: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to select patients and to confirm absence of disease within 2 cm of the nipple. Nipple tissue was serially sectioned at pathologic analysis. Circumareolar/nipple-areola free graft, inframammary, crescentic mastopexy, areola crossing, and radial incisions were used. Immediate reconstruction was performed with implant or tissue expander placement or latissimus dorsi muscle, transverse rectus abdominis muscle, or deep inferior epigastric perforator muscle flaps. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nipple-areola complex skin survival, implant loss, skin flap necrosis, wound infection, and occult neoplasm.
RESULTS: Nipple-areola complex skin survival was complete in 80% of patients (n = 51) and partial in 16% (n = 10); it was highest with the radial incision at 97% survival (n = 34). Occult ductal carcinoma in situ in the nipple-areola complex was found in 2 patients (3%), and the affected nipple-areola complex was subsequently removed. Other complications included implant loss, total skin-sparing skin flap necrosis, and infection. Although follow-up is limited, no patients have exhibited cancer recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Total skin-sparing mastectomy is a viable surgical option in selected patients with breast neoplasm and those who choose prophylactic mastectomy, and may increase the willingness of women to consider mastectomy to reduce their risk of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18209151     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.1.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  31 in total

Review 1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy--is it worth the risk?

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Umberto Veronesi; Visnu Lohsiriwat; PierCarlo Rey; Giuseppe Curigliano; Stefano Martella; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Andrea Manconi; Edoardo Botteri; Florence Didier; Roberto Orecchia; Mario Rietjens
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Anatomy relevant to conservative mastectomy.

Authors:  Rachel L O'Connell; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  Oncological safety of prophylactic breast surgery: skin-sparing and nipple-sparing versus total mastectomy.

Authors:  Victorien M T van Verschuer; Marike C Maijers; Carolien H M van Deurzen; Linetta B Koppert
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 4.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

5.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy - Extended Indications and Limitations.

Authors:  Markus Niemeyera; Johannes Ettla; Birgit Plattnera; Rainer Schmida; Daniel Müllerb; Hans-Günther Machensb; Marion Kiechlea; Stefan Paepkea
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Breast reconstruction: current and future options.

Authors:  Henry Paul; Tahira I Prendergast; Bryson Nicholson; Shenita White; Wayne Ai Frederick
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2011-08-17

7.  Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Incisions for Cancer Extirpation Prospective Cohort Trial: Perfusion, Complications, and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Odom; Rajiv P Parikh; Grace Um; Simone W Kantola; Amy E Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler; Marissa M Tenenbaum; Terence M Myckatyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Nipple-sparing mastectomies: Clinical outcomes from a single academic institution.

Authors:  Barbara Dull; Leah Conant; Terence Myckatyn; Marissa Tenenbaum; Amy Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04

9.  Oncological outcome and patient satisfaction with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Sara Reefy; Neill Patani; Anne Anderson; Gwyne Burgoyne; Hisham Osman; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: An Evolution of the Conceptual and Technical Approach over a Two-Decade Period.

Authors:  Peter G Cordeiro; Leila Jazayeri
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.