Literature DB >> 18209019

Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene.

John E Hayes1, Linda M Bartoshuk, Judith R Kidd, Valerie B Duffy.   

Abstract

Polymorphisms in the TAS2R38 gene provide insight to phenotypes long associated 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and phenylthiocarbamide bitterness. We tested relationships between TAS2R38 genotype, taste phenotype, and fungiform papillae (FP) number in 139 females and 59 males (age range 21-60 years), primarily of European ancestry. DNA was analyzed for 3 polymorphic sites, identifying common (alanine-valine-isoleucine [AVI/AVI], heterozygotes, proline-alanine-valine [PAV/PAV]) and rare (proline-valine-isoleucine, alanine-alanine-valine, AAI) forms. Individuals with PROP threshold >0.15 mM were almost exclusively AVI/AVI; those with threshold <0.1 mM could have any genotype. PAV/PAVs were more difficult to identify with PROP taste measures, although perceived bitterness of moderate PROP concentrations (0.32, 1 mM) had better correspondence with genotype than did threshold. For AVI/AVIs, increases in bitterness from 1 to 3.2 mM PROP nearly paralleled those of TAS2R38 heterozygotes and PAV/PAVs. Some bitterness gains were related to FP number sampled from a standard area on the tongue tip, yet the PROP bitterness-FP relationship differed across genotype. Among homozygotes, FP was a significant determinant of PROP bitterness; heterozygotes showed a flat relationship. Those tasting concentrated PROP as more bitter also tasted concentrated sucrose, citric acid, sodium chloride, and quinine as more intense, even after statistically controlling for TAS2R38 genotype, FP, and intensity of tones (nonoral standard). To summarize, although PROP threshold generally exhibited single-gene complete dominance, PROP bitterness may involve additional bitter receptors as evidenced by misclassification of some nontaster homozygotes and the bitterness functions for concentrated PROP. Variability in receptor expression may explain attenuated bitterness-FP relationships. PROP bitterness does associate with heightened taste sensations (i.e., supertasting), but this is not due to TAS2R38 polymorphisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18209019     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjm084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  101 in total

1.  Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Margaret R Wallace; Valerie S Knopik; Deborah M Herbstman; Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Shared genetic contributions of fruit and vegetable consumption with BMI in families 20 y after sharing a household.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Seung-Yeon Lee; Sarah C Couch; John Morrison; Jessica G Woo
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Human bitter perception correlates with bitter receptor messenger RNA expression in taste cells.

Authors:  Sarah V Lipchock; Julie A Mennella; Andrew I Spielman; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Genetic Vulnerability to Menthol Cigarette Preference in Women.

Authors:  Cheryl Oncken; Richard Feinn; Jonathan Covault; Valerie Duffy; Ellen Dornelas; Henry R Kranzler; Heather Z Sankey
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Changes in taste and food preferences in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yeon-Hee Kim; Gun Min Kim; Sungtaek Son; Mina Song; Sangun Park; Hyun Cheol Chung; Seung-Min Lee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Taking the bitter with the sweet: relationship of supertasting and sweet preference with metabolic syndrome and dietary intake.

Authors:  Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Deborah F Tate; Dominic Moore; Barry Popkin
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Regional differences in suprathreshold intensity for bitter and umami stimuli.

Authors:  Emma L Feeney; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.833

8.  Measures of individual differences in taste and creaminess perception.

Authors:  Juyun Lim; Lenka Urban; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Sex differences in the effects of inherited bitter thiourea sensitivity on body weight in 4-6-year-old children.

Authors:  Kathleen L Keller; Adrienne Reid; Megan C MacDougall; Hope Cassano; Joo Lee Song; Liyong Deng; Patricia Lanzano; Wendy K Chung; Harry R Kissileff
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 5.002

10.  Reliability of Threshold and Suprathreshold Methods for Taste Phenotyping: Characterization with PROP and Sodium Chloride.

Authors:  Veronica Galindo-Cuspinera; Thierry Waeber; Nicolas Antille; Christoph Hartmann; Nicola Stead; Nathalie Martin
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.833

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.