Literature DB >> 18207490

Articular constraint, handedness, and directional asymmetry in the human second metacarpal.

Richard A Lazenby1, David M L Cooper, Sarah Angus, Benedikt Hallgrímsson.   

Abstract

The hypothesis that functional adaptation of joint surfaces to mechanical loading occurs primarily through change in mass, density, and structure of subarticular trabeculae (the "articular constraint" model) is investigated through an analysis of directional asymmetry among three separate bone compartments in the human second metacarpal. Measures of midshaft cross-sectional geometry, osteometry of the distal epiphysis, and subarticular trabecular microarchitecture of the distal epiphysis (assessed by high-resolution microcomputed tomography) were determined for 29 paired male and female metacarpals from a well-preserved nineteenth-century Euro-Canadian historic cemetery sample. For each measure, asymmetry was quantified using both mean-difference and confidence-interval methods. Both methods found a significant right-hand bias for measures of structural strength in midshaft geometry, as has been previously noted for this sample. Articular size, however, exhibits a right-hand bias only with regard to mediolateral, and not dorsopalmar, dimensions, a result that may reflect directional asymmetry in hand breadth at the distal palmar arch. The most striking asymmetries occur for subarticular trabecular microarchitecture. The right metacarpal head exhibits greater bone volume fraction, bone surface density, trabecular number, connectivity, and a more platelike rather than rodlike structure. These outcomes confer greater resistance to both axial compressive and shear strains for the metacarpal head at the metacarpophalangeal arthrosis. In all, these results confirm and extend previous research documenting structural asymmetries and limb dominance and are consistent with the concept of articular constraint. They also suggest a morphological signal through which functional asymmetry associated with handedness in fossil hominins may be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18207490     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  8 in total

1.  Methodological considerations for analyzing trabecular architecture: an example from the primate hand.

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell; Matthew M Skinner; Richard Lazenby; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  A three-dimensional microcomputed tomographic study of site-specific variation in trabecular microarchitecture in the human second metacarpal.

Authors:  Richard A Lazenby; Sarah Angus; David M L Cooper; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Modelling Young's modulus for porous bones with microstructural variation and anisotropy.

Authors:  Jianfeng F Wang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  A review of trabecular bone functional adaptation: what have we learned from trabecular analyses in extant hominoids and what can we apply to fossils?

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Medial-to-lateral ratio of tibiofemoral subchondral bone area is adapted to alignment and mechanical load.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Martin Hudelmaier; September Cahue; Meredith Marshall; Leena Sharma
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Preliminary pilot fMRI study of neuropostural optimization with a noninvasive asymmetric radioelectric brain stimulation protocol in functional dysmetria.

Authors:  Marco Mura; Alessandro Castagna; Vania Fontani; Salvatore Rinaldi
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.570

7.  Trabecular bone structure correlates with hand posture and use in hominoids.

Authors:  Zewdi J Tsegai; Tracy L Kivell; Thomas Gross; N Huynh Nguyen; Dieter H Pahr; Jeroen B Smaers; Matthew M Skinner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Relationship between body mass, lean mass, fat mass, and limb bone cross-sectional geometry: Implications for estimating body mass and physique from the skeleton.

Authors:  Emma Pomeroy; Alison Macintosh; Jonathan C K Wells; Tim J Cole; Jay T Stock
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.868

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.