Literature DB >> 18206147

Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique.

Giuseppe Ricci1, Sandra Perticarari, Rita Boscolo, Marcella Montico, Secondo Guaschino, Gianni Presani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of density-gradient centrifugation and swim-up on sperm apoptosis by using a multiparameter flow cytometric method.
DESIGN: Autocontrolled split-sample study.
SETTING: Tertiary infertility center. PATIENT(S): Sixty-two male partners of couples undergoing infertility investigations. INTERVENTION(S): Each sample was analyzed both before and after semen preparation by optical microscopy and by flow cytometry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Percentage of viable, apoptotic, and necrotic sperm and recovery rate of total motile, progressive motile, and viable sperm before and after the two sperm preparation methods. RESULT(S): Compared with the original semen, the mean percentages of apoptotic and necrotic sperm were significantly lower after both sperm preparation methods. The mean percentage of viable sperm was significantly higher after swim-up compared with gradient centrifugation. The recovery rates of total motile, progressive motile, and viable sperm were significantly higher using gradient centrifugation compared with swim-up. The viable sperm percentage and the progressive sperm motility were significant predictors for negative difference between the two methods in terms of viable sperm percentage after preparation. CONCLUSION(S): Both sperm preparation methods allow obtaining a sperm population with a low percentage of apoptotic sperm. Therefore, the risk of using apoptotic sperm for clinical treatment seems to be rather low. The choice of method will depend on whether IVF/ICSI or intrauterine insemination is to be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18206147     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  28 in total

1.  Sperm processing by swim-up and density gradient is effective in elimination of sperm with DNA damage.

Authors:  Varshini Jayaraman; Dinesh Upadhya; Pratap Kumar Narayan; Satish Kumar Adiga
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Frequency of Sperm DNA Fragmentation According to Selection Method: Comparison and Relevance of a Microfluidic Device and a Swim-up Procedure.

Authors:  Kanako Kishi; Hiromi Ogata; Seiji Ogata; Yuri Mizusawa; Eri Okamoto; Yukiko Matsumoto; Shoji Kokeguchi; Masahide Shiotani
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

3.  The ability of sperm selection techniques to remove single- or double-strand DNA damage.

Authors:  María Enciso; Miriam Iglesias; Isabel Galán; Jonás Sarasa; Antonio Gosálvez; Jaime Gosálvez
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Differences in caspase-8 and -9 activity and sperm motility in infertile males of Li nationality in China.

Authors:  Xiaobin Wei; Qixing Li; Zhouxin Han; Danqin Lin; Ping Yu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

5.  Efficacy of swim-up versus density gradient centrifugation in improving sperm deformity rate and DNA fragmentation index in semen samples from teratozoospermic patients.

Authors:  Xia Xue; Wan-Shan Wang; Juan-Zi Shi; Si-Lin Zhang; Wan-Qiu Zhao; Wen-Hao Shi; Bao-Zhu Guo; Zhen Qin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Combination of swim-up and density gradient separation methods effectively eliminate DNA damaged sperm.

Authors:  Surveen Ghumman; Satish Kumar Adiga; Dinesh Upadhya; Guruprasad Kalthur; Varshini Jayaraman; Satish Bola Rao; Pratap Kumar
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 7.  Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Carolien M Boomsma; Ben J Cohlen; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-15

8.  Annexin V magnetic-activated cell sorting versus swim-up for the selection of human sperm in ART: is the new approach better then the traditional one?

Authors:  Marco Nadalini; Nicoletta Tarozzi; Marlea Di Santo; Andrea Borini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Preparation and incubation conditions affect the DNA integrity of ejaculated human spermatozoa.

Authors:  Rieko Matsuura; Takumi Takeuchi; Atsumi Yoshida
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Sperm preparation after freezing improves motile sperm count, motility, and viability in frozen-thawed sperm compared with sperm preparation before freezing-thawing process.

Authors:  A Palomar Rios; A Gascón; J V Martínez; S Balasch; I Molina Botella
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.