Literature DB >> 18204954

SECCA procedure for the treatment of fecal incontinence: results of five-year follow-up.

Takeshi Takahashi-Monroy1, Martin Morales, Sandra Garcia-Osogobio, Miguel A Valdovinos, Carlos Belmonte, Camilo Barreto, Xeily Zarate, Orlando Bada, Liliana Velasco.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the long-term (5-year) durability of radiofrequency energy delivery for fecal incontinence.
METHODS: This was an extension of the follow-up from our original prospective study in which patients who suffered from fecal incontinence were treated with the SECCA system for radiofrequency energy delivery to the anal canal muscle. The Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Scale (0-20), fecal incontinence-related quality of life score, and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 were administered to five years. Differences between baseline and follow-up were analyzed by using paired t-test.
RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were treated and followed for five years, including 18 females (aged 57.1 (range, 44-77) years). The mean duration for fecal incontinence was 7.1 (range, 1-21) years. At five-year follow-up, the mean fecal incontinence score had improved from 14.37 to 8.26 (P<0.00025) with 16 patients (84.2 percent) demonstrating>50 percent improvement. All fecal incontinence-related quality of life scores improved, including lifestyle (2.43 to 3.15; P<0.00075), coping (1.73 to 2.6; P<0.00083), depression (2.24 to 3.15; P<0.0002), and embarrassment (1.56 to 2.51; P<0.0003). The social function component of the Short-Form 36 improved from 38.3 to 60 (P<0.05). There was a trend toward improvement in the mental component summary of the Short-Form 36 from 38.1 to 48.14. There were no long-term complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant and sustained improvements in fecal incontinence symptoms and quality of life are seen at five years after treatment with the SECCA system. This treatment should be considered for patients suffering from fecal incontinence not amenable to surgery and who have failed conservative management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18204954     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9169-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  23 in total

Review 1.  Fecal incontinence: part 4 of a series of articles on incontinence.

Authors:  Michael Probst; Helen Pages; Jürgen F Riemann; Axel Eickhoff; Franz Raulf; Gerd Kolbert
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Current management of fecal incontinence: choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes.

Authors:  Julie Ann M Van Koughnett; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Surgical management for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Joselin L Anandam
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-09

Review 4.  Impact of fecal incontinence and its treatment on quality of life in women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-03

5.  Mesenchymal stem cells can improve anal pressures after anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Levilester Salcedo; Maritza Mayorga; Margot Damaser; Brian Balog; Robert Butler; Marc Penn; Massarat Zutshi
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.020

Review 6.  Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Guy R Orangio; Massarat Zutshi; Suraj Alva; Tracy L Hull; Peter W Marcello; David A Margolin; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Surgical Interventions and the Use of Device-Aided Therapy for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence and Defecatory Disorders.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Satish S C Rao; Andrea S Shin
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 8.  Anal incontinence-sphincter ani repair: indications, techniques, outcome.

Authors:  Susan Galandiuk; Leslie A Roth; Quincy J Greene
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Clinical response and sustainability of treatment with temperature-controlled radiofrequency energy (Secca) in patients with faecal incontinence: 3 years follow-up.

Authors:  T J Lam; A P Visscher; M M Meurs-Szojda; R J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Bowel management for the treatment of pediatric fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andrea Bischoff; Marc A Levitt; Alberto Peña
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.