Literature DB >> 28838787

Surgical Interventions and the Use of Device-Aided Therapy for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence and Defecatory Disorders.

Adil E Bharucha1, Satish S C Rao2, Andrea S Shin3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this clinical practice update expert review is to describe the key principles in the use of surgical interventions and device-aided therapy for managing fecal incontinence (FI) and defecatory disorders. The best practices outlined in this review are based on relevant publications, including systematic reviews and expert opinion (when applicable). Best Practice Advice 1: A stepwise approach should be followed for management of FI. Conservative therapies (diet, fluids, techniques to improve evacuation, a bowel training program, management of diarrhea and constipation with diet and medications if necessary) will benefit approximately 25% of patients and should be tried first. Best Practice Advice 2: Pelvic floor retraining with biofeedback therapy is recommended for patients with FI who do not respond to the conservative measures indicated above. Best Practice Advice 3: Perianal bulking agents such as intra-anal injection of dextranomer may be considered when conservative measures and biofeedback therapy fail. Best Practice Advice 4: Sacral nerve stimulation should be considered for patients with moderate or severe FI in whom symptoms have not responded after a 3-month or longer trial of conservative measures and biofeedback therapy and who do not have contraindications to these procedures. Best Practice Advice 5: Until further evidence is available, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation should not be used for managing FI in clinical practice. Best Practice Advice 6: Barrier devices should be offered to patients who have failed conservative or surgical therapy, or in those who have failed conservative therapy who do not want or are not eligible for more invasive interventions. Best Practice Advice 7: Anal sphincter repair (sphincteroplasty) should be considered in postpartum women with FI and in patients with recent sphincter injuries. In patients who present later with symptoms of FI unresponsive to conservative and biofeedback therapy and evidence of sphincter damage, sphincteroplasty may be considered when perianal bulking injection and sacral nerve stimulation are not available or have proven unsuccessful. Best Practice Advice 8: The artificial anal sphincter, dynamic graciloplasty, may be considered for patients with medically refractory severe FI who have failed treatment or are not candidates for barrier devices, sacral nerve stimulation, perianal bulking injection, sphincteroplasty and a colostomy. Best Practice Advice 9: Major anatomic defects (eg, rectovaginal fistula, full-thickness rectal prolapse, fistula in ano, or cloaca-like deformity) should be rectified with surgery. Best Practice Advice 10: A colostomy should be considered in patients with severe FI who have failed conservative treatment and have failed or are not candidates for barrier devices, minimally invasive surgical interventions, and sphincteroplasty. Best Practice Advice 11: A magnetic anal sphincter device may be considered for patients with medically refractory severe FI who have failed or are not candidates for barrier devices, perianal bulking injection, sacral nerve stimulation, sphincteroplasty, or a colostomy. Data regarding efficacy are limited and 40% of patients had moderate or severe complications. Best Practice Advice 12: For defecatory disorders, biofeedback therapy is the treatment of choice. Best Practice Advice 13: Based on limited evidence, sacral nerve stimulation should not be used for managing defecatory disorders in clinical practice. Best Practice Advice 14: Anterograde colonic enemas are not effective in the long term for management of defecatory disorders. Best Practice Advice 15: The stapled transanal rectal resection and related procedures should not be routinely performed for correction of structural abnormalities in patients with defecatory disorders.
Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Defecatory Disorders; Devices; Fecal Incontinence; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28838787      PMCID: PMC5693715          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  84 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of faecal incontinence.

Authors:  A E Chapman; B Geerdes; P Hewett; J Young; T Eyers; G Kiroff; G J Maddern
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Comparison of three perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse.

Authors:  F Agachan; P Reissman; J Pfeifer; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 0.954

3.  Treatment efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation in slow transit constipation: a two-phase, double-blind randomized controlled crossover study.

Authors:  Phil G Dinning; Linda Hunt; Vicki Patton; Teng Zhang; Michal Szczesniak; Val Gebski; Mike Jones; Peter Stewart; David Z Lubowski; Ian J Cook
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Supplementation with dietary fiber improves fecal incontinence.

Authors:  D Z Bliss; H J Jung; K Savik; A Lowry; M LeMoine; L Jensen; C Werner; K Schaffer
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Prospective randomized double-blind study of temporary sacral nerve stimulation in patients with rectal evacuatory dysfunction and rectal hyposensitivity.

Authors:  Charles H Knowles; Noel Thin; Katherine Gill; Chetan Bhan; Karyn Grimmer; Peter J Lunniss; Norman S Williams; S Mark Scott
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Investigation of the pathophysiology of fecal seepage.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao; Ramazan Ozturk; Mary Stessman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Quality of Life and Timing of Stoma Closure in Patients With Rectal Cancer Undergoing Low Anterior Resection With Diverting Stoma: A Multicenter Longitudinal Observational Study.

Authors:  Florian Herrle; Flavius Sandra-Petrescu; Christel Weiss; Stefan Post; Norbert Runkel; Peter Kienle
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Results, outcome predictors, and complications after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gagliardi; Mario Pescatori; Donato F Altomare; Gian Andrea Binda; Corrado Bottini; Giuseppe Dodi; Vincenzino Filingeri; Giovanni Milito; Marcella Rinaldi; Giovanni Romano; Liana Spazzafumo; Mario Trompetto
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 9.  The perspective of the patient.

Authors:  Nancy J Norton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Randomized controlled trial of percutaneous versus transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence.

Authors:  A T George; K Kalmar; S Sala; K Kopanakis; A Panarese; T C Dudding; J R Hollingshead; R J Nicholls; C J Vaizey
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  9 in total

1.  Epidemiologic Trends and Diagnostic Evaluation of Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Amol Sharma; Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-06

2.  Effects of Alfuzosin, an α1-Adrenergic Antagonist, on Anal Pressures and Bowel Habits in Women With and Without Defecatory Disorders.

Authors:  Subhankar Chakraborty; Kelly Feuerhak; Anjani Muthyala; William S Harmsen; Kent R Bailey; Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Keys to the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Satish S C Rao
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2022-03

Review 4.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Charles H Knowles; Isabelle Mack; Allison Malcolm; Nicholas Oblizajek; Satish Rao; S Mark Scott; Andrea Shin; Paul Enck
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 65.038

Review 5.  Chronic Constipation.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Arnold Wald
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 6.  Diagnosis and Management of Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Arnold Wald
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-03-26

7.  A multicenter study of anorectal pressures and rectal sensation measured with portable manometry in healthy women and men.

Authors:  Mayank Sharma; Ann C Lowry; Satish S Rao; William E Whitehead; Lawrence A Szarka; Frank A Hamilton; Adil E Bharucha
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.960

8.  Translumbosacral Neuromodulation Therapy Is a Promising Option for Fecal Incontinence.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Nicholas R Oblizajek
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 12.045

9.  Simple Anal Reinforcement with Anal Encirclement Using an Artificial Ligament in Patients with fecal Incontinence: A Single-center Observational Study.

Authors:  Tatsuya Abe; Masao Kunimoto; Yoshikazu Hachiro; Shigenori Ota; Kei Ohara; Mitsuhiro Inagaki
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2022-07-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.