BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine (EBM), a comprehensive method to support clinical decision making by using evidence, has been instrumental in clinical specialties but not yet in insurance medicine. AIMS: We developed and evaluated a workshop on EBM for Dutch social insurance physicians who perform disability evaluations. METHODS: Sixty-six social insurance physicians followed a 1-day introductory workshop that focused on teaching two EBM core skills: to ask answerable questions and to search for the best evidence. All outcomes were measured before, immediately after and 3 months after the workshop by means of self-assessment. The primary outcomes were knowledge, skills, attitude and intention to apply EBM in practice. The secondary outcomes were social influence, self-efficacy and behaviour. RESULTS: Immediately after the workshop, a marked and significant improvement was seen in self-assessed skills (mean difference 4.2, 95% CI 3.7-4.6) and in self-efficacy to apply EBM (mean difference 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8). For attitude, knowledge and intention, the improvements were small. Three months after the workshop, the improvements in skills (mean difference 2.3, 95% CI 1.8-2.9) and self-efficacy (mean difference 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.6) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: The workshop improved self-assessed EBM skills and self-efficacy both in the short and long term. The workshop also resulted in limited short-term improvements in self-assessed knowledge and in the intention to apply EBM in practice. The EBM approach can be successfully taught to social insurance physicians working in the field of disability evaluation.
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine (EBM), a comprehensive method to support clinical decision making by using evidence, has been instrumental in clinical specialties but not yet in insurance medicine. AIMS: We developed and evaluated a workshop on EBM for Dutch social insurance physicians who perform disability evaluations. METHODS: Sixty-six social insurance physicians followed a 1-day introductory workshop that focused on teaching two EBM core skills: to ask answerable questions and to search for the best evidence. All outcomes were measured before, immediately after and 3 months after the workshop by means of self-assessment. The primary outcomes were knowledge, skills, attitude and intention to apply EBM in practice. The secondary outcomes were social influence, self-efficacy and behaviour. RESULTS: Immediately after the workshop, a marked and significant improvement was seen in self-assessed skills (mean difference 4.2, 95% CI 3.7-4.6) and in self-efficacy to apply EBM (mean difference 0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.8). For attitude, knowledge and intention, the improvements were small. Three months after the workshop, the improvements in skills (mean difference 2.3, 95% CI 1.8-2.9) and self-efficacy (mean difference 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.6) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: The workshop improved self-assessed EBM skills and self-efficacy both in the short and long term. The workshop also resulted in limited short-term improvements in self-assessed knowledge and in the intention to apply EBM in practice. The EBM approach can be successfully taught to social insurance physicians working in the field of disability evaluation.
Authors: Sylvia P Snoeck-Krygsman; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Birgit H P M Donker-Cools; Carel T J Hulshof; Lyanne P Jansen; René J Kox; Jan L Hoving Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Feico Zwerver; Antonius J M Schellart; Dirk L Knol; Johannes R Anema; Allard J van der Beek Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Jan L Hoving; Rob Kok; Sarah M Ketelaar; Paul B A Smits; Frank J H van Dijk; Jos H Verbeek Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Rob Kok; Jan L Hoving; Paul B A Smits; Sarah M Ketelaar; Frank J H van Dijk; Jos H Verbeek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.240