Literature DB >> 18203706

What next for preimplantation genetic screening?

Joyce Harper1, Karen Sermon, Joep Geraedts, Katerina Vesela, Gary Harton, Alan Thornhill, Tugce Pehlivan, Francesco Fiorentino, Sioban SenGupta, Christine de Die-Smulders, Cristina Magli, Celine Moutou, Leeanda Wilton.   

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening (preimplantation genetic screening-PGS) has been used to detect chromosomally normal embryos from subfertile patients. The main indications are advanced maternal age (AMA), repeated implantation failure, repeated miscarriages and severe male factor infertility. Many non-randomized PGS studies have been published and report an increase in implantation rate, and/or a decrease in miscarriage rate. Recently, two randomized controlled trials have been conducted on patients with AMA as the only indication. Neither study showed a benefit in performing PGS using live birth rate as the measure of success. The debate on the usefulness of PGS is ongoing; the only effective way to resolve the debate is to perform more well-designed and well-executed randomized clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18203706     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  16 in total

1.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Slow and ultrarapid cryopreservation of biopsied mouse blastocysts and its effect on DNA integrity index.

Authors:  Amr Kader; Tommaso Falcone; Rakesh K Sharma; Devna Mangrola; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cédric Le Caignec; Michèle Ampe; Peter Konings; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Mustapha Amyere; Miikka Vikkula; Frans Schuit; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Geert Verbeke; Thomas D'Hooghe; Yves Moreau; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  PGS-FISH in reproductive medicine and perspective directions for improvement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Prenatal and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Joris Robert Vermeesch; Thierry Voet; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Next-generation sequencing analysis of each blastomere in good-quality embryos: insights into the origins and mechanisms of embryonic aneuploidy in cleavage-stage embryos.

Authors:  Qiuwen Shi; Ying Qiu; Changlong Xu; Hua Yang; Chunyuan Li; Nina Li; Yumei Gao; Caiyun Yu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Association between amino acid turnover and chromosome aneuploidy during human preimplantation embryo development in vitro.

Authors:  Helen M Picton; Kay Elder; Franchesca D Houghton; Judith A Hawkhead; Anthony J Rutherford; Jan E Hogg; Henry J Leese; Sarah E Harris
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for stargardt disease.

Authors:  Mahsa A Sohrab; Rando Allikmets; Michael M Guarnaccia; R Theodore Smith
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS).

Authors:  Michael C Summers; Andrew D Foland
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  What next for preimplantation genetic screening? High mitotic chromosome instability rate provides the biological basis for the low success rate.

Authors:  Evelyne Vanneste; Thierry Voet; Cindy Melotte; Sophie Debrock; Karen Sermon; Catherine Staessen; Inge Liebaers; Jean-Pierre Fryns; Thomas D'Hooghe; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.