Neil K Mehta1, Virginia W Chang. 1. Graduate Group in Demography, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. nmehta@sas.upenn.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Empiric studies find that contextual factors affect individual weight status over and above individual socioeconomic characteristics. Given increasing levels of obesity, researchers are examining how the food environment contributes to unhealthy weight status. An important change to this environment is the increasing availability of away-from-home eating establishments such as restaurants. METHODS: This study analyzed the relationship between the restaurant environment and weight status across counties in the United States. Individual data from the 2002-2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N=714,054) were linked with restaurant data from the 2002 U.S. Economic Census. Fast-food and full-service restaurant density, along with restaurant mix (the ratio of fast-food to full-service restaurants), were assessed. RESULTS: Fast-food restaurant density and a higher ratio of fast-food to full-service restaurants were associated with higher individual-level weight status (BMI and the risk of being obese). In contrast, a higher density of full-service restaurants was associated with lower weight status. CONCLUSIONS: Area-level restaurant mix emerged as an important correlate of weight status, with components of the restaurant environment exhibiting differential associations. Hence, it is the availability of fast-food relative to other away-from-home choices that appears salient for unhealthy weight outcomes. Areas with a high density of full-service restaurants were indicative of a more healthful eating environment, suggesting a need for research into the comparative healthfulness of foods served at different types of restaurants. Future prospective studies are required to delineate causal pathways.
BACKGROUND: Empiric studies find that contextual factors affect individual weight status over and above individual socioeconomic characteristics. Given increasing levels of obesity, researchers are examining how the food environment contributes to unhealthy weight status. An important change to this environment is the increasing availability of away-from-home eating establishments such as restaurants. METHODS: This study analyzed the relationship between the restaurant environment and weight status across counties in the United States. Individual data from the 2002-2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N=714,054) were linked with restaurant data from the 2002 U.S. Economic Census. Fast-food and full-service restaurant density, along with restaurant mix (the ratio of fast-food to full-service restaurants), were assessed. RESULTS: Fast-food restaurant density and a higher ratio of fast-food to full-service restaurants were associated with higher individual-level weight status (BMI and the risk of being obese). In contrast, a higher density of full-service restaurants was associated with lower weight status. CONCLUSIONS: Area-level restaurant mix emerged as an important correlate of weight status, with components of the restaurant environment exhibiting differential associations. Hence, it is the availability of fast-food relative to other away-from-home choices that appears salient for unhealthy weight outcomes. Areas with a high density of full-service restaurants were indicative of a more healthful eating environment, suggesting a need for research into the comparative healthfulness of foods served at different types of restaurants. Future prospective studies are required to delineate causal pathways.
Authors: Elizabeth A Baker; Cheryl Kelly; Ellen Barnidge; Jennifer Strayhorn; Mario Schootman; Jim Struthers; Deidre Griffith Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-04-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Majid Ezzati; Hilarie Martin; Suzanne Skjold; Stephen Vander Hoorn; Christopher J L Murray Journal: J R Soc Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Geneviève Mercille; Lucie Richard; Lise Gauvin; Yan Kestens; Hélène Payette; Mark Daniel Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Fuzhong Li; Peter Harmer; Bradley J Cardinal; Mark Bosworth; Deborah Johnson-Shelton; Jane M Moore; Alan Acock; Naruepon Vongjaturapat Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-01-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Sara N Bleich; Jesse C Jones-Smith; Marian P Jarlenski; Julia A Wolfson; Johannah M Frelier; Huiru Tao; Yuchen Hu; Anna Zink; Caroline G Dunn; Mark J Soto; Bradley J Herring Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 5.128