PURPOSE: To investigate the possible relationship between myopia progression and near accommodative lag. METHODS: A 1-year longitudinal study was carried out to measure the accommodative response and myopia progression in 62 children with mild and progressing myopia at two visits: they were 10.81 +/- 1.60 years old with refractive error -1.70 +/- 0.76 D on entry. Repeated measurements included refractive error, ocular biometry and accommodative response at 33 cm. The refractive error was determined by autorefraction after cycloplegia; ocular biometry by A-scan ultrasonography; and accommodative response by an open-field autorefractor. Results were based on the right eye and analysed by paired t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Myopia progression in the year was -0.72 +/- 0.37 D (p < 0.001) with a range from -0.06 to -1.96 D. The change of axial length and vitreous depth were 0.41 +/- 0.25 mm (p < 0.001) and 0.36 +/- 0.24 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. The near lag was 0.76 +/- 0.29 D on entry and 0.72 +/- 0.38 D 1 year later (p = 0.79). No statistically significant correlations were found between near lag vs myopia progression and the change of ocular biometry as a whole (p > 0.10 for all). There was no significant difference in myopia progression between myopic children with greater than, compared to less than the mean amount of near lag (p = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates no statistically significant relationship between myopia progression and near accommodation lag in children with mild and progressing myopia. There is no evidence that near lag provides a stimulus to progression in this stage of myopia.
PURPOSE: To investigate the possible relationship between myopia progression and near accommodative lag. METHODS: A 1-year longitudinal study was carried out to measure the accommodative response and myopia progression in 62 children with mild and progressing myopia at two visits: they were 10.81 +/- 1.60 years old with refractive error -1.70 +/- 0.76 D on entry. Repeated measurements included refractive error, ocular biometry and accommodative response at 33 cm. The refractive error was determined by autorefraction after cycloplegia; ocular biometry by A-scan ultrasonography; and accommodative response by an open-field autorefractor. Results were based on the right eye and analysed by paired t-test and Pearson's correlation coefficient. RESULTS:Myopia progression in the year was -0.72 +/- 0.37 D (p < 0.001) with a range from -0.06 to -1.96 D. The change of axial length and vitreous depth were 0.41 +/- 0.25 mm (p < 0.001) and 0.36 +/- 0.24 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. The near lag was 0.76 +/- 0.29 D on entry and 0.72 +/- 0.38 D 1 year later (p = 0.79). No statistically significant correlations were found between near lag vs myopia progression and the change of ocular biometry as a whole (p > 0.10 for all). There was no significant difference in myopia progression between myopic children with greater than, compared to less than the mean amount of near lag (p = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates no statistically significant relationship between myopia progression and near accommodation lag in children with mild and progressing myopia. There is no evidence that near lag provides a stimulus to progression in this stage of myopia.
Authors: Leslie Donovan; Padmaja Sankaridurg; Arthur Ho; Thomas Naduvilath; Earl L Smith; Brien A Holden Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Philip B Kruger; Francisco Lara; Norberto López-Gil Journal: Clin Exp Optom Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 2.742