Literature DB >> 18196522

Assessing the scalability of dynamic field gradient focusing by linear modeling.

Noah I Tracy1, Cornelius F Ivory.   

Abstract

Dynamic field gradient focusing (DFGF) separates and concentrates proteins in native buffers, where proteins are most soluble, using a computer-controlled electric field gradient which lets the operator adjust the pace and resolution of the separation in real-time. The work in this paper assessed whether DFGF could be scaled up from microgram analytical-scale protein loads to milligram preparative-scale loads. Linear modeling of the electric potential, protein transport, and heat transfer simulated the performance of a preparative-scale DFGF instrument. The electric potential model showed where the electrodes should be placed to optimize the shape and strength of the electric field gradient. Results from the protein transport model suggested that in 10 min the device should separate 10 mg each of two proteins whose electrophoretic mobilities differ by 5 x. Proteins with electrophoretic mobilities differing by only 5% should separate in 3 h. The heat transfer model showed that the preparative DFGF design could dissipate 1 kW of Joule heat while keeping the separation chamber at 25 degrees C. Model results pointed to DFGF successfully scaling up by 1000 x using the proposed instrument design.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18196522      PMCID: PMC2921188          DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200700307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sep Sci        ISSN: 1615-9306            Impact factor:   3.645


  7 in total

1.  Analytical equilibrium gradient methods.

Authors:  Qinggang Wang; H Dennis Tolley; David A LeFebre; Milton L Lee
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Preparative free-flow electrofocusing in a vortex-stabilized annulus.

Authors:  Cornelius F Ivory
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Towards a miniaturised system for dynamic field gradient focused separation of proteins.

Authors:  P Myers; K D Bartle
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 4.  Electric field gradient focusing.

Authors:  Ryan T Kelly; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 5.  Several new electrofocusing techniques.

Authors:  Cornelius F Ivory
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Influence of transport properties in electric field gradient focusing.

Authors:  Paul H Humble; John N Harb; H Dennis Tolley; Adam T Woolley; Paul B Farnsworth; Milton L Lee
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  Protein focusing in a conductivity gradient.

Authors:  R D Greenlee; C F Ivory
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr
  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Design and construction of a preparative-scale dynamic field gradient focusing apparatus.

Authors:  Noah I Tracy; Zheng Huang; Cornelius F Ivory
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2008-01-29

2.  Influence of the semi-permeable membrane on the performance of dynamic field gradient focusing.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Burke; Cornelius F Ivory
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.535

3.  Development of a membrane-less dynamic field gradient focusing device for the separation of low-molecular-weight molecules.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Burke; Colin D Smith; Cornelius F Ivory
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Protein separation using preparative-scale dynamic field gradient focusing.

Authors:  Noah I Tracy; Cornelius F Ivory
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Simultaneous separation of negatively and positively charged species in dynamic field gradient focusing using a dual polarity electric field.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Burke; Zheng Huang; Cornelius F Ivory
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.