Literature DB >> 18195377

Advanced liver fibrosis: diagnosis with 3D whole-liver perfusion MR imaging--initial experience.

Mari Hagiwara1, Henry Rusinek, Vivian S Lee, Mariela Losada, Michael A Bannan, Glenn A Krinsky, Bachir Taouli.   

Abstract

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate sensitivity and specificity of various estimated perfusion parameters at three-dimensional (3D) perfusion magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the liver in the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis (stage >or= 3), with histologic analysis, liver function tests, or MR imaging as the reference standard. Whole-liver 3D perfusion MR imaging was performed in 27 patients (17 men, 10 women; mean age, 55 years) after dynamic injection of 8-10 mL of gadopentetate dimeglumine. The following estimated perfusion parameters were measured with a dual-input single-compartment model: absolute arterial blood flow (F(a)), absolute portal venous blood flow (F(p)), absolute total liver blood flow (F(t)) (F(t) = F(a) + F(p)), arterial fraction (ART), portal venous fraction (PV), distribution volume (DV), and mean transit time (MTT) of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Patients were assigned to two groups (those with fibrosis stage <or= 2 and those with fibrosis stage >or= 3), and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used to compare F(a), F(p), F(t), ART, PV, DV, and MTT between groups. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the utility of perfusion estimates as predictors of advanced liver fibrosis. There were significant differences for all perfusion MR imaging-estimated parameters except F(p) and F(t). There was an increase in F(a), ART, DV, and MTT and a decrease in PV in patients with advanced fibrosis compared with those without advanced fibrosis. DV had the best performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.824, a sensitivity of 76.9% (95% confidence interval: 46.2%, 94.7%), and a specificity of 78.5% (95% confidence interval: 49.2%, 95.1%) in the prediction of advanced fibrosis. (c) RSNA, 2008.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18195377     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2463070077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  88 in total

1.  Shear-wave elastography for the estimation of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: determining accuracy and ideal site for measurement.

Authors:  Anthony E Samir; Manish Dhyani; Abhinav Vij; Atul K Bhan; Elkan F Halpern; Jorge Méndez-Navarro; Kathleen E Corey; Raymond T Chung
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Ayse Ahsen Bakan; Ercan Inci; Selim Bakan; Suut Gokturk; Tan Cimilli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Authors:  Yoav Lurie; Muriel Webb; Ruth Cytter-Kuint; Shimon Shteingart; Gerardo Z Lederkremer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  MR Imaging of activated hepatic stellate cells in liver injured by CCl4 of rats with integrin-targeted ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide.

Authors:  Qing-Bing Wang; Yu Han; Ting-Ting Jiang; Wei-Min Chai; Ke-Min Chen; Bing-Ya Liu; Li-Fu Wang; Chunfu Zhang; Deng-Bin Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Quantification of hepatic arterial and portal perfusion with dynamic computed tomography: comparison of maximum-slope and dual-input one-compartment model methods.

Authors:  Masaya Miyazaki; Yoshito Tsushima; Akiko Miyazaki; Bishnuhari Paudyal; Makoto Amanuma; Keigo Endo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Quantitative hepatic perfusion modeling using DCE-MRI with sequential breathholds.

Authors:  Eric M Bultman; Ethan K Brodsky; Debra E Horng; Pablo Irarrazaval; William R Schelman; Walter F Block; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Novel functional magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers for assessing response to therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Z Yuan; W-T Li; X-D Ye; H-Y Zhu; W-J Peng
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: Is there a correlation with flow and perfusion metrics obtained with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI?

Authors:  Stefanie J Hectors; Mathilde Wagner; Cecilia Besa; Octavia Bane; Hadrien A Dyvorne; M Isabel Fiel; Hongfa Zhu; Michael Donovan; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  [New developments in MRI of the liver].

Authors:  N Bastati-Huber; H Prosch; S Baroud; S Magnaldi; W Schima; A Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 10.  Multiparametric MR Imaging in Abdominal Malignancies.

Authors:  Antonio Luna; Shivani Pahwa; Claudio Bonini; Lidia Alcalá-Mata; Katherine L Wright; Vikas Gulani
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.