Literature DB >> 18193356

How health care complexity leads to cooperation and affects the autonomy of health care professionals.

Eric Molleman1, Manda Broekhuis, Renee Stoffels, Frans Jaspers.   

Abstract

Health professionals increasingly face patients with complex health problems and this pressurizes them to cooperate. The authors have analyzed how the complexity of health care problems relates to two types of cooperation: consultation and multidisciplinary teamwork (MTW). Moreover, they have analyzed the impact of these two types of cooperation on perceived professional autonomy. Two teams were studied, one team dealing with geriatric patients and another treating oncology patients. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews, studied written documents, held informal discussions and observed the teams at work. Consultation was most likely to take place when a patient had multiple problems. However, if these problems were interrelated, i.e. the solution for one problem interfered with solving another, then MTW was favored. The same was true when the available information was equivocal such that there were conflicting interpretations of a problem. How the professionals perceived the relationship between complexity and the need to cooperate depended on their expertise, their occupational background, and their work orientation. Consultation did not affect the professional autonomy of the health care professionals. MTW however did decrease the perceived level of professional autonomy. The extent to which this occurred seemed to depend on the quality of the interpersonal relations within the team. The findings can help in selecting the most appropriate and efficient type of cooperation based on the complexity of a patient's problems. They can also help team leaders to stimulate reflection and feedback processes, and medical trainers to develop competencies among students related to such teamwork behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18193356     DOI: 10.1007/s10728-007-0080-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  7 in total

1.  Interprofessionality in health and social care: the Achilles' heel of partnership?

Authors:  Bob Hudson
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.338

Review 2.  Complexity science: complexity and clinical care.

Authors:  T Wilson; T Holt; T Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-22

Review 3.  Tensions in sharing client confidences while respecting autonomy: implications for interprofessional practice.

Authors:  A Allison; A Ewens
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.874

4.  "We decide, you carry it out": a social network analysis of multidisciplinary long-term care teams.

Authors:  C Cott
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The multidisciplinary meeting: An indispensable aid to communication between different specialities.

Authors:  Thomas Ruhstaller; Helen Roe; Beat Thürlimann; Jonathan J Nicoll
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Are teamwork and professional autonomy compatible, and do they result in improved hospital care?

Authors:  A M Rafferty; J Ball; L H Aiken
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

7.  Attitudes toward working on interdisciplinary healthcare teams: a comparison by discipline.

Authors:  Rosanne M Leipzig; Kathryn Hyer; Kirsten Ek; Sylvan Wallenstein; Maria L Vezina; Susan Fairchild; Christine K Cassel; Judith L Howe
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.562

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Has Interprofessional Education Changed Learning Preferences? A National Perspective.

Authors:  T Michael Kashner; Debbie L Hettler; Robert A Zeiss; David C Aron; David S Bernett; Judy L Brannen; John M Byrne; Grant W Cannon; Barbara K Chang; Mary B Dougherty; Stuart C Gilman; Gloria J Holland; Catherine P Kaminetzky; Annie B Wicker; Sheri A Keitz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Terminology used to describe health care teams: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Jennifer Chamberlain-Salaun; Jane Mills; Kim Usher
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2013-03-03

3.  'It just has to click': Internists' views of: what constitutes productive interactions with chronically ill patients.

Authors:  N M H Kromme; C T B Ahaus; R O B Gans; H B M van de Wiel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Stimulating collaboration between human and veterinary health care professionals.

Authors:  Björn G M Eussen; Jaap Schaveling; Maria J Dragt; Robert Jan Blomme
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Internists' dilemmas in their interactions with chronically ill patients; A comparison of their interaction strategies and dilemmas in two different medical contexts.

Authors:  Nicolien M H Kromme; Kees T B Ahaus; Reinold O B Gans; Harry B M van de Wiel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ethical challenges of integration across primary and secondary care: a qualitative and normative analysis.

Authors:  Alex McKeown; Charlotte Cliffe; Arun Arora; Ann Griffin
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Electronic health record implementation and healthcare workers' work characteristics and autonomous motivation-a before-and-after study.

Authors:  Gepke L Veenstra; Eric F Rietzschel; Eric Molleman; Erik Heineman; Jan Pols; Gera A Welker
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Integrated oncogeriatric approach: a systematic review of the literature using concept analysis.

Authors:  Dominique Tremblay; Kathleen Charlebois; Catherine Terret; Sonia Joannette; Jean Latreille
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.