Literature DB >> 18193324

The utility of metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy in patients with pheochromocytoma.

David Yü Greenblatt1, Yoram Shenker, Herbert Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiolabeled metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy (MIBG) can be used to image pheochromocytomas. While cross-sectional imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) usually localize the tumor, MIBG is often obtained to rule out multifocal and metastatic disease, and to corroborate anatomic imaging with functional data. We questioned the utility of MIBG in the diagnosis and management of pheochromocytoma.
METHODS: All patients who received MIBG at one academic center from 1999 to 2004 were identified. For the subset of patients who received MIBG in the work-up of possible pheochromocytoma, the following data were reviewed: demographics, symptoms, results of biochemical and imaging studies, histopathological diagnosis, and management.
RESULTS: A total of 60 patients received MIBG, including 27 patients for the evaluation of a possible pheochromocytoma. Biochemical testing was performed in all patients. Fourteen patients received MIBG despite normal biochemistry and an absence of risk factors such as a hereditary syndrome or prior history of pheochromocytoma. None of these 14 low-risk patients with negative biochemistry had a final diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. In the ten patients with pheochromocytoma, all tumors were localized by CT and/or MRI. Importantly, MIBG did not identify any foci of disease not seen on cross sectional imaging, and MIBG did not alter the surgical management of any patient in this series.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with clinical findings suggestive of pheochromocytoma, biochemical testing should be used to confirm the diagnosis, and cross-sectional imaging is sufficient for tumor localization. In the absence of hereditary disease or a past history of pheochromocytoma, MIBG does not alter the treatment plan and therefore should not be routinely performed. Instead, MIBG should be used selectively, such as for the rare patient with a biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and no tumor seen on exhaustive anatomical imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18193324     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9776-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  7 in total

Review 1.  The incremental benefit of functional imaging in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan P Brito; Noor Asi; Michael R Gionfriddo; Catalina Norman; Aaron L Leppin; Claudia Zeballos-Palacios; Chaitanya Undavalli; Zhen Wang; Juan P Domecq; Gabriela Prustsky; Tarig A Elraiyah; Larry J Prokop; Victor M Montori; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Should 123I-MIBG scintigraphy be part of the workup for pheochromocytomas?

Authors:  Christian A Koch
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-02

Review 3.  Management of Adrenal Masses.

Authors:  Hattangadi Sanjay Bhat; Balagopal Nair Tiyadath
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-12-17

Review 4.  Molecular imaging of neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Jorge A Carrasquillo; Clara C Chen
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 5.  New imaging approaches to phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

Authors:  Bas Havekes; Kathryn King; Edwin W Lai; Johannes A Romijn; Eleonora P M Corssmit; Karel Pacak
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 6.  Adrenal hemorrhagic pseudocyst as the differential diagnosis of pheochromocytoma--a review of the clinical features in cases with radiographically diagnosed pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Y Kyoda; T Tanaka; T Maeda; N Masumori; T Tsukamoto
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Composite pheochromocytoma-ganglioneuroma: a case with two distinct components radiographically.

Authors:  Hiromi Edo; Eiko Hyoue; Kohei Hamamoto; Masaki Tsuda; Fumio Morimura; Kousuke Okano; Michiko Okazaki; Kazuki Kawamura; Keiichi Ito; Kimiya Sato; Naoki Edo; Hiroshi Shinmoto
Journal:  BJR Case Rep       Date:  2022-09-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.