PURPOSE: HER2 is a potential target for radionuclide therapy, especially when HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells are resistant to Herceptin(R) treatment. Therefore, it is of interest to analyse whether HER2 overexpressing tumour cells have different inherent radiosensitivity. METHODS: The radiosensitivity of three often used HER2 overexpressing cell lines, SKOV-3, SKBR-3 and BT-474, was analysed. The cells were exposed to conventional photon irradiation, low linear energy transfer (LET), to characterise their inherent radiosensitivity. The analysis was made with clonogenic survival and growth extrapolation assays. The cells were also exposed to alpha particles, high LET, from (211)At decays using the HER2-binding affibody molecule (211)At-(Z(HER2:4))(2) as targeting agent. Assays for studies of internalisation of the affibody molecule were applied. RESULTS: SKOV-3 cells were most radioresistant, SKBR-3 cells were intermediate and BT-474 cells were most sensitive as measured with the clonogenic and growth extrapolation assays after photon irradiation. The HER2 dependent cellular uptake of (211)At was qualitatively similar for all three cell lines. However, the sensitivity to the alpha particles from (211)At differed; SKOV-3 was most resistant, SKBR-3 intermediate and BT-474 most sensitive. These differences were unexpected because it is assumed that all types of cells should have similar sensitivity to high-LET radiation. The sensitivity to alpha particle exposure correlated with internalisation of the affibody molecule and with size of the cell nucleus. CONCLUSION: There can be differences in radiosensitivity, which, if they also exist between patient breast cancer cells, are important to consider for both conventional radiotherapy and for HER2-targeted radionuclide therapy.
PURPOSE:HER2 is a potential target for radionuclide therapy, especially when HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells are resistant to Herceptin(R) treatment. Therefore, it is of interest to analyse whether HER2 overexpressing tumour cells have different inherent radiosensitivity. METHODS: The radiosensitivity of three often used HER2 overexpressing cell lines, SKOV-3, SKBR-3 and BT-474, was analysed. The cells were exposed to conventional photon irradiation, low linear energy transfer (LET), to characterise their inherent radiosensitivity. The analysis was made with clonogenic survival and growth extrapolation assays. The cells were also exposed to alpha particles, high LET, from (211)At decays using the HER2-binding affibody molecule (211)At-(Z(HER2:4))(2) as targeting agent. Assays for studies of internalisation of the affibody molecule were applied. RESULTS: SKOV-3 cells were most radioresistant, SKBR-3 cells were intermediate and BT-474 cells were most sensitive as measured with the clonogenic and growth extrapolation assays after photon irradiation. The HER2 dependent cellular uptake of (211)At was qualitatively similar for all three cell lines. However, the sensitivity to the alpha particles from (211)At differed; SKOV-3 was most resistant, SKBR-3 intermediate and BT-474 most sensitive. These differences were unexpected because it is assumed that all types of cells should have similar sensitivity to high-LET radiation. The sensitivity to alpha particle exposure correlated with internalisation of the affibody molecule and with size of the cell nucleus. CONCLUSION: There can be differences in radiosensitivity, which, if they also exist between patientbreast cancer cells, are important to consider for both conventional radiotherapy and for HER2-targeted radionuclide therapy.
Authors: Anna Orlova; Mikaela Magnusson; Tove L J Eriksson; Martin Nilsson; Barbro Larsson; Ingmarie Höidén-Guthenberg; Charles Widström; Jörgen Carlsson; Vladimir Tolmachev; Stefan Ståhl; Fredrik Y Nilsson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: A Steren; B U Sevin; J Perras; R Angioli; H Nguyen; L Guerra; O Koechli; H E Averette Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 1993-02 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: A Berchuck; A Kamel; R Whitaker; B Kerns; G Olt; R Kinney; J T Soper; R Dodge; D L Clarke-Pearson; P Marks Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1990-07-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Yongsheng Liu; Anzhelika Vorobyeva; Anna Orlova; Mark W Konijnenberg; Tianqi Xu; Olga Bragina; Annika Loftenius; Erica Rosander; Fredrik Y Frejd; Vladimir Tolmachev Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 6.525
Authors: Kristina Subik; Jin-Feng Lee; Laurie Baxter; Tamera Strzepek; Dawn Costello; Patti Crowley; Lianping Xing; Mien-Chie Hung; Thomas Bonfiglio; David G Hicks; Ping Tang Journal: Breast Cancer (Auckl) Date: 2010-05-20