Literature DB >> 1819317

Controlled study of heparin versus epoprostenol sodium (prostacyclin) as the sole anticoagulant for chronic hemodialysis.

R J Caruana1, M C Smith, D Clyne, J W Crow, J M Zinn, J H Diehl.   

Abstract

We performed a controlled parallel study comparing the effects of heparin sodium to epoprostenol sodium (prostacyclin sodium, Flolan) during hemodialysis in 30 dialysis patients. Mean fiber bundle volume loss and dialyzer function were similar with both anticoagulation methods. Intradialytic symptoms occurred in 100% of the epoprostenol dialyses and 88% of the heparin dialyses, but only 10/325 epoprostenol and 3/374 heparin dialysis were discontinued prematurely because of symptoms. Long-term hemodialysis with epoprostenol is safe and effective. Epoprostenol may be a suitable alternative to heparin in some dialysis settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1819317     DOI: 10.1159/000170027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Purif        ISSN: 0253-5068            Impact factor:   2.614


  3 in total

Review 1.  What are the anticoagulation options for intermittent hemodialysis?

Authors:  Andrew Davenport
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  Anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for preventing central venous haemodialysis catheter malfunction in patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Jessica N Ivany; Vlado Perkovic; Martin P Gallagher; Mark Woodward; Meg J Jardine
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-04

3.  Hemodialysis without systemic anticoagulation: a prospective randomized trial to evaluate 3 strategies in patients at risk of bleeding.

Authors:  Bruno Guéry; Corinne Alberti; Aude Servais; Elarbi Harrami; Lynda Bererhi; Brigitte Zins; Malik Touam; Dominique Joly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.