Literature DB >> 18192188

Origins of the other metazoan body plans: the evolution of larval forms.

Rudolf A Raff1.   

Abstract

Bilaterian animal body plan origins are not solely about adult forms. Most animals have larvae with body plans, ontogenies and ecologies distinct from adults. There are two primary hypotheses for larval origins. The first hypothesis suggests that the first animals were small pelagic forms similar to modern larvae, with adult bilaterian body plans evolved subsequently. The second hypothesis suggests that adult bilaterian body plans evolved first and that larval body plans arose by interpolation of features into direct-developing ontogenies. The two hypotheses have different consequences for understanding parsimony in evolution of larvae and of developmental genetic mechanisms. If primitive metazoans were like modern larvae and distinct adult forms evolved independently, there should be little commonality of patterning genes among adult body plans. However, sharing of patterning genes is observed. If larvae arose by co-option of adult bilaterian-expressed genes into independently evolved larval forms, larvae may show morphological convergence, but with distinct patterning genes, and this is observed. Thus, comparative studies of gene expression support independent origins of larval features. Precambrian and Cambrian embryonic fossils are also consistent with direct development of the adult as being primitive, with planktonic larvae arising during the Cambrian. Larvae have continued to co-opt genes and evolve new features, allowing study of developmental evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18192188      PMCID: PMC2614227          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  34 in total

Review 1.  The significance of moulting in Ecdysozoan evolution.

Authors:  J W Valentine; A G Collins
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 2.  The epitome of hand waving? Larval feeding and hypotheses of metazoan phylogeny.

Authors:  G W Rouse
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 3.  A critical reappraisal of the fossil record of the bilaterian phyla.

Authors:  G E Budd; S Jensen
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-05

Review 4.  Segmentation: mono- or polyphyletic?

Authors:  Elaine C Seaver
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.203

5.  Phylogenetic effects, the loss of complex characters, and the evolution of development in calyptraeid gastropods.

Authors:  Rachel Collin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Embryonic development in the primitive bilaterian Neochildia fusca: normal morphogenesis and isolation of POU genes Brn-1 and Brn-3.

Authors:  Nallur B Ramachandra; Ruth D Gates; Peter Ladurner; David K Jacobs; Volker Hartenstein
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2002-02-21       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Morphogenesis of the turtle shell: the development of a novel structure in tetrapod evolution.

Authors:  S F Gilbert; G A Loredo; A Brukman; A C Burke
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Evolution of the bilaterian larval foregut.

Authors:  D Arendt; U Technau; J Wittbrodt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Adaptive evolution of bindin in the genus Heliocidaris is correlated with the shift to direct development.

Authors:  Kirk S Zigler; Elizabeth C Raff; Ellen Popodi; Rudolf A Raff; H A Lessios
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 10.  The last common bilaterian ancestor.

Authors:  Douglas H Erwin; Eric H Davidson
Journal:  Development       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Origin and early evolution of neural circuits for the control of ciliary locomotion.

Authors:  Gáspár Jékely
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A conserved germline multipotency program.

Authors:  Celina E Juliano; S Zachary Swartz; Gary M Wessel
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  The evolution of the animals: introduction to a Linnean tercentenary celebration.

Authors:  Maximilian J Telford; D Timothy J Littlewood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Marine invertebrates, model organisms, and the modern synthesis: epistemic values, evo-devo, and exclusion.

Authors:  Alan C Love
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 1.919

Review 5.  Indirect development, transdifferentiation and the macroregulatory evolution of metazoans.

Authors:  Cesar Arenas-Mena
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Early origin of the bilaterian developmental toolkit.

Authors:  Douglas H Erwin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Divergence of ectodermal and mesodermal gene regulatory network linkages in early development of sea urchins.

Authors:  Eric M Erkenbrack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Nanos functions to maintain the fate of the small micromere lineage in the sea urchin embryo.

Authors:  Celina E Juliano; Mamiko Yajima; Gary M Wessel
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Eye evolution and its functional basis.

Authors:  Dan-E Nilsson
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Xenoturbella bocki exhibits direct development with similarities to Acoelomorpha.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakano; Kennet Lundin; Sarah J Bourlat; Maximilian J Telford; Peter Funch; Jens R Nyengaard; Matthias Obst; Michael C Thorndyke
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.