Literature DB >> 11252571

The significance of moulting in Ecdysozoan evolution.

J W Valentine1, A G Collins.   

Abstract

Three major bilaterian clades first appear in the Early Cambrian fossil record: Deuterostomia, Lophotrochozoa, and Ecdysozoa. The taxa placed in Ecdysozoa are characterized by a moulting habit, unknown in the other major clades. The origin and consequences of moulting are of fundamental importance to the history of the ecdysozoan clade, chiefly because moulting precludes motile ectodermal cilia. Moulting may have originated as an adaptation to permit the enlargement, during growth, of secreted cuticular spines, flanges, and other structures used as ancillary locomotory devices. A combination of phylogenetic and fossil evidence suggests that the early members of these clades were small vermiform paracoelomates that likely lacked indirect-developing planktotrophic larvae. Thus, the evolution of planktotrophic larvae may have been independently achieved at least three times within Bilateria. The nonmoulting clades evolved larvae that swim and feed via ciliated tufts and bands, presumably intercalating these forms within their early developmental systems. Within Ecdysozoa, feeding larvae lacked ciliary feeding tracts and evolved by modification of early instars, employing limbs or setae to generate feeding currents. The setting aside during larval life of cells that give rise to adult features is probably an adaptation associated with metamorphosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11252571     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-142x.2000.00043.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  12 in total

1.  Evaluating hypotheses of basal animal phylogeny using complete sequences of large and small subunit rRNA.

Authors:  M Medina; A G Collins; J D Silberman; M L Sogin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Coelomata and not Ecdysozoa: evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  Yuri I Wolf; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 3.  Origins of the other metazoan body plans: the evolution of larval forms.

Authors:  Rudolf A Raff
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Indirect development, transdifferentiation and the macroregulatory evolution of metazoans.

Authors:  Cesar Arenas-Mena
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Origin of ecdysis: fossil evidence from 535-million-year-old scalidophoran worms.

Authors:  Deng Wang; Jean Vannier; Isabell Schumann; Xing Wang; Xiao-Guang Yang; Tsuyoshi Komiya; Kentaro Uesugi; Jie Sun; Jian Han
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Investigations into the phylogenetic position of Micrognathozoa using four molecular loci.

Authors:  Gonzalo Giribet; Martin V Sørensen; Peter Funch; Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen; Wolfgang Sterrer
Journal:  Cladistics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.254

7.  The evolutionary position of nematodes.

Authors:  Jaime E Blair; Kazuho Ikeo; Takashi Gojobori; S Blair Hedges
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2002-04-08       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  A study on the distribution of 37 well conserved families of C2H2 zinc finger genes in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Arun Seetharam; Gary W Stuart
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 9.  Life cycle evolution: was the eumetazoan ancestor a holopelagic, planktotrophic gastraea?

Authors:  Claus Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Pix proteins and the evolution of centrioles.

Authors:  Hugh R Woodland; Andrew M Fry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.