Literature DB >> 18191843

Establishing the intercycle variability of three-dimensional ultrasonographic predictors of ovarian reserve.

Kannamannadiar Jayaprakasan1, Bruce Campbell, James Hopkisson, Jeanette Clewes, Ian Johnson, Nick Raine-Fenning.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the intercycle variability of antral follicle counts (AFCs) and ovarian volume, as measured by using three-dimensional ultrasound, and to compare these to the variation in basal FSH levels.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: University-based assisted conception unit. PATIENT(S): One hundred women undergoing two cycles of assisted reproductive technology. INTERVENTION(S): Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound assessment and venepuncture in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, immediately before assisted reproductive technology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intercycle variability of AFC, ovarian volume, and basal FSH. RESULT(S): The limits of agreement between cycles were +4.03 and -3.71 for AFC, +2.67 and -3.03 cm(3) for ovarian volume, and +4.36 and -4.52 IU/L for FSH levels. The AFC showed the least degree of variation, with a range of 0.48 times its own mean, in contrast to corresponding values of 0.73 and 1.29 for ovarian volume and basal FSH levels, respectively. The intraobserver variability for AFC and ovarian volume and the intraassay variability for FSH were 0.37, 0.17, and 0.42 times the mean of those respective variables. CONCLUSION(S): The AFC demonstrates a lower intercycle variability than do ovarian volume and basal FSH level. The observed intercycle variability of the AFC may primarily be caused by observer variability, and the true biological variation may be minimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18191843     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

1.  A characterization of the relationship of ovarian reserve markers with age.

Authors:  Mitchell P Rosen; Erica Johnstone; Charles E McCulloch; Sonya M Schuh-Huerta; Barbara Sternfeld; Renee A Reijo-Pera; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Ovarian Reserve Testing: A Review of the Options, Their Applications, and Their Limitations.

Authors:  Nicole D Ulrich; Erica E Marsh
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Ovarian reserve assessment for infertility investigation.

Authors:  Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho; David Barreira Gomes Sobrinho; Andréa Duarte Damasceno Vieira; Manoela Porto Silva Resende; Antônio César Paes Barbosa; Adelino Amaral Silva; Hitomi Miura Nakagava
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-01-26

Review 4.  Fertility with early reduction of ovarian reserve: the last straw that breaks the Camel's back.

Authors:  Sabahat Rasool; Duru Shah
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2017-10-11

5.  Ovarian Reserve Markers in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency: Within Different Clinical Stages and Different Etiologies.

Authors:  Xue Jiao; Tingting Meng; Yiwei Zhai; Lijuan Zhao; Wei Luo; Peihao Liu; Yingying Qin
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  The Optimal Time of Ovarian Reserve Recovery After Laparoscopic Unilateral Ovarian Non-Endometriotic Cystectomy.

Authors:  Huaping Li; Bin Yan; Yanli Wang; Zhiming Shu; Ping Li; Yahong Liu; Ying Wang; Xiaohong Ni; Zhou Liu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 5.555

7.  Serum anti-Müllerian hormone recovery after ovarian cystectomy for endometriosis: A retrospective study among Korean women.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Dae Gy Hong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  The meaning of anti-Müllerian hormone levels in patients at a high risk of poor ovarian response.

Authors:  Hyun Jong Park; Geun Ho Lee; Du Sik Gong; Tae Ki Yoon; Woo Sik Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2016-09-22

9.  Searching for female reproductive aging and longevity biomarkers.

Authors:  Svetlana Yureneva; Viktoriya Averkova; Denis Silachev; Andrey Donnikov; Alla Gavisova; Vladimir Serov; Gennady Sukhikh
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.682

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.