OBJECTIVE: To identify markers of ovarian age that best match the pattern of oocyte loss seen in histology specimens. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University. PATIENT(S): Caucasian women (n = 252) aged 25-45 years. INTERVENTION(S): none. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The relationship between antral follicle count (AFC), antimüllerian hormone (AMH), inhibin B, FSH, and E(2) with age was estimated using the power model, which previously has been shown to most accurately describe oocyte loss in histologic specimens. The power model was fit to each marker and used to compare the rates of change at ages 30 and 40 with the histologic pattern. Among those markers following the pattern, R(2) was used to compare the degree of relationship with age. RESULT(S): Both AMH levels and AFC exhibited significant progressive declines with age. The average rates of loss per year for AFC and AMH were, respectively, -0.57 and -1.09 at age 30, and -1.33 and -3.06 at age 40. FSH, inhibin B, and E(2) did not exhibit progressive rates of change. The R(2) for AFC was 27.3% and for AMH was 22.7%. CONCLUSION(S): Only AFC and AMH follow the pattern of oocyte loss observed histologically. Although AMH may be more cost-effective, AFC is a slightly more accurate noninvasive measure for ovarian aging.
OBJECTIVE: To identify markers of ovarian age that best match the pattern of oocyte loss seen in histology specimens. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University. PATIENT(S): Caucasian women (n = 252) aged 25-45 years. INTERVENTION(S): none. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The relationship between antral follicle count (AFC), antimüllerian hormone (AMH), inhibin B, FSH, and E(2) with age was estimated using the power model, which previously has been shown to most accurately describe oocyte loss in histologic specimens. The power model was fit to each marker and used to compare the rates of change at ages 30 and 40 with the histologic pattern. Among those markers following the pattern, R(2) was used to compare the degree of relationship with age. RESULT(S): Both AMH levels and AFC exhibited significant progressive declines with age. The average rates of loss per year for AFC and AMH were, respectively, -0.57 and -1.09 at age 30, and -1.33 and -3.06 at age 40. FSH, inhibin B, and E(2) did not exhibit progressive rates of change. The R(2) for AFC was 27.3% and for AMH was 22.7%. CONCLUSION(S): Only AFC and AMH follow the pattern of oocyte loss observed histologically. Although AMH may be more cost-effective, AFC is a slightly more accurate noninvasive measure for ovarian aging.
Authors: G J Scheffer; F J M Broekmans; C W N Looman; M Blankenstein; B C J M Fauser; F H teJong; E R teVelde Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: I A J van Rooij; F J M Broekmans; E R te Velde; B C J M Fauser; L F J M M Bancsi; F H de Jong; A P N Themmen Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: E B Gold; J Bromberger; S Crawford; S Samuels; G A Greendale; S D Harlow; J Skurnick Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2001-05-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Ana B Maldonado-Cárceles; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Irene Souter; Audrey J Gaskins; Mariel Arvizu; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Jorge E Chavarro Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Maria E Bleil; Bradley M Appelhans; Melissa D Latham; Michelle A Irving; Steven E Gregorich; Nancy E Adler; Marcelle I Cedars Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; JoAnn E Manson; Alexandra C Purdue-Smithe; Anne Z Steiner; A Heather Eliassen; Susan E Hankinson; Bernard A Rosner; Brian W Whitcomb Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Hannah M Atkins; Cynthia J Willson; Marnie Silverstein; Matthew Jorgensen; Edison Floyd; Jay R Kaplan; Susan E Appt Journal: Comp Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 0.982
Authors: John F Randolph; Siobán D Harlow; Margaret E Helmuth; Huiyong Zheng; Daniel S McConnell Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 6.918