PURPOSE: To compare dose-volume histogram parameters of standard Point A and magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional optimized dose plans in 21 consecutive patients who underwent pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients received external beam radiotherapy (elective target dose, 45 Gy in 25-30 fractions; tumor target dose, 50-60 Gy in 25-30 fractions). PDR-BT was applied with a tandem-ring applicator. Additional ring-guided titanium needles were used in 4 patients and a multichannel vaginal cylinder in 2 patients. Dose planning was done using 1.5 Tesla T(1)-weighted and T(2)-weighted paratransversal magnetic resonance imaging scans. T(1)-weighted visible oil-containing tubes were used for applicator reconstruction. The prescribed standard dose for PDR-BT was 10 Gy (1 Gy/pulse, 1 pulse/h) for two to three fractions to reach a physical dose of 80 Gy to Point A. The total dose (external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy) was normalized to an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions using alpha/beta = 10 Gy for tumor, alpha/beta = 3 Gy for normal tissue, and a repair half-time of 1.5 h. The goal of optimization was dose received by 90% of the target volume (D(90)) of > or =85 Gy(alpha/beta10) in the high-risk clinical target volume (cervix and remaining tumor at brachytherapy), but keeping the minimal dose to 2 cm(3) of the bladder and rectum/sigmoid at <90 and <75 Gy(alpha/beta3), respectively. RESULTS: Using three-dimensional optimization, all dose-volume histogram constraints were met in 16 of 21 patients compared with 3 of 21 patients with two-dimensional library plans (p < 0.001). Optimization increased the minimal target dose (D(100)) of the high-risk clinical target volume (p < 0.007) and decreased the minimal dose to 2 cm(3) for the sigmoid significantly (p = 0.03). For the high-risk clinical target volume, D(90) was 91 +/- 8 Gy(alpha/beta10) and D(100) was 76 +/- 5 Gy(alpha/beta10). The minimal dose to 2 cm(3) for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid was 73 +/- 6, 67 +/- 6, and 69 +/- 6 Gy(alpha/beta3), respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that magnetic resonance imaging-guided optimization of PDR-BT for locally advanced cervical cancer significantly improved the dose-volume histogram parameters.
PURPOSE: To compare dose-volume histogram parameters of standard Point A and magnetic resonance imaging-based three-dimensional optimized dose plans in 21 consecutive patients who underwent pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy (PDR-BT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients received external beam radiotherapy (elective target dose, 45 Gy in 25-30 fractions; tumor target dose, 50-60 Gy in 25-30 fractions). PDR-BT was applied with a tandem-ring applicator. Additional ring-guided titanium needles were used in 4 patients and a multichannel vaginal cylinder in 2 patients. Dose planning was done using 1.5 Tesla T(1)-weighted and T(2)-weighted paratransversal magnetic resonance imaging scans. T(1)-weighted visible oil-containing tubes were used for applicator reconstruction. The prescribed standard dose for PDR-BT was 10 Gy (1 Gy/pulse, 1 pulse/h) for two to three fractions to reach a physical dose of 80 Gy to Point A. The total dose (external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy) was normalized to an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions using alpha/beta = 10 Gy for tumor, alpha/beta = 3 Gy for normal tissue, and a repair half-time of 1.5 h. The goal of optimization was dose received by 90% of the target volume (D(90)) of > or =85 Gy(alpha/beta10) in the high-risk clinical target volume (cervix and remaining tumor at brachytherapy), but keeping the minimal dose to 2 cm(3) of the bladder and rectum/sigmoid at <90 and <75 Gy(alpha/beta3), respectively. RESULTS: Using three-dimensional optimization, all dose-volume histogram constraints were met in 16 of 21 patients compared with 3 of 21 patients with two-dimensional library plans (p < 0.001). Optimization increased the minimal target dose (D(100)) of the high-risk clinical target volume (p < 0.007) and decreased the minimal dose to 2 cm(3) for the sigmoid significantly (p = 0.03). For the high-risk clinical target volume, D(90) was 91 +/- 8 Gy(alpha/beta10) and D(100) was 76 +/- 5 Gy(alpha/beta10). The minimal dose to 2 cm(3) for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid was 73 +/- 6, 67 +/- 6, and 69 +/- 6 Gy(alpha/beta3), respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of our study have shown that magnetic resonance imaging-guided optimization of PDR-BT for locally advanced cervical cancer significantly improved the dose-volume histogram parameters.
Authors: Qiyong Fan; Anamaria R Yeung; Robert Amdur; Richard Helmig; Justin Park; Jonathan Li; Darren Kahler; Chihray Liu; Bo Lu Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-02-10
Authors: Kristen L Lurie; Roland Angst; Dimitar V Zlatev; Joseph C Liao; Audrey K Ellerbee Bowden Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Caroline L Holloway; Marie-Lynn Racine; Robert A Cormack; Desmond A O'Farrell; Akila N Viswanathan Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2009-08-06 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Johannes C A Dimopoulos; Gertrude Schirl; Anja Baldinger; Thomas H Helbich; Richard Pötter Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Akila N Viswanathan; Beth Erickson; David K Gaffney; Sushil Beriwal; Sudershan K Bhatia; Omer Lee Burnett; David P D'Souza; Nikhilesh Patil; Michael G Haddock; Anuja Jhingran; Ellen L Jones; Charles A Kunos; Larissa J Lee; Lilie L Lin; Nina A Mayr; Ivy Petersen; Primoz Petric; Lorraine Portelance; William Small; Jonathan B Strauss; Kanokpis Townamchai; Aaron H Wolfson; Catheryn M Yashar; Walter Bosch Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038