Literature DB >> 18186034

A micro-costing approach to estimating hospital costs for appendectomy in a cross-European context.

Jonas Schreyögg1.   

Abstract

This paper aims (a) to determine whether variations in the hospital costs of appendectomy in EU member states are larger within individual countries or between different countries and (b) to explore causes for variations in costs between hospitals and countries. To do so, hospitalisation costs and reimbursement rates for appendectomy were obtained from 54 hospitals in nine European member states based on 1786 cases using a standardised methodology. Regression analysis was performed using hospital characteristics, treatment characteristics, and purchasing power parities (PPP) as explanatory variables in a multilevel framework. The within-country standard error was estimated to 294 euros (27%), whereas the between-country standard error was 796 euros (73%). Excluding hospitals in Spain, Hungary, and Poland, which had significantly lower costs than hospitals in the other countries in our analysis, the within-country standard error was 331 euros (57%) and the between-country standard error dropped to 248 euros (43%). Regression results show that the treatment decision for open surgery was associated with significantly lower costs, whereas a greater number of beds and a higher staff per bed ratio were associated with significantly higher costs. PPP explained a major part of the between-country variance. Copyright 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18186034     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  8 in total

1.  What can we learn from international comparisons of costs by DRG?

Authors:  M Pirson; L Schenker; D Martins; Duong Dung; J J Chalé; P Leclercq
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2012-01-12

2.  Cost-identification analysis of total laryngectomy: an itemized approach to hospital costs.

Authors:  Raj C Dedhia; Kenneth J Smith; Joel L Weissfeld; Melissa I Saul; Steve C Lee; Eugene N Myers; Jonas T Johnson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a multilevel approach with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Laura Haas; Tom Stargardt; Jonas Schreyoegg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-10-08

4.  Early outcome of the Korean Diagnosis-Related Groups payment system for appendectomy.

Authors:  Hyeyoung Kim; In Mok Jung; Keong Won Yun; Seung Chul Heo; Young Joon Ahn; Ki-Tae Hwang; Hae Won Lee; Do Hoon Koo; Eunyoung Ko; Hye Seong Ahn; Rumi Shin; Jung Kee Chung
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 1.859

5.  Microcosting quantity data collection methods.

Authors:  Kevin D Frick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The costs of repatriating an ill seafarer: a micro-costing approach.

Authors:  Mads D Faurby; Olaf C Jensen; Lulu Hjarnoe; Despena Andrioti
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-12-06

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of five procedures for great saphenous vein reflux in a Norwegian healthcare setting or societal setting.

Authors:  Eivind Inderhaug; Carl-Henrik Schelp; Inge Glambek; Ivar S Kristiansen
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-09-24

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of initial nonoperative management versus emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Kiyoaki Sugiura; Keiichi Suzuki; Tomoshige Umeyama; Kenshi Omagari; Takeo Hashimoto; Akihiko Tamura
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.