Literature DB >> 18184145

Identification and analysis of genomic regions with large between-population differentiation in humans.

S Myles1, K Tang, M Somel, R E Green, J Kelso, M Stoneking.   

Abstract

The primary aim of genetic association and linkage studies is to identify genetic variants that contribute to phenotypic variation within human populations. Since the overwhelming majority of human genetic variation is found within populations, these methods are expected to be effective and can likely be extrapolated from one human population to another. However, they may lack power in detecting the genetic variants that contribute to phenotypes that differ greatly between human populations. Phenotypes that show large differences between populations are expected to be associated with genomic regions exhibiting large allele frequency differences between populations. Thus, from genome-wide polymorphism data genomic regions with large allele frequency differences between populations can be identified, and evaluated as candidates for large between-population phenotypic differences. Here we use allele frequency data from approximately 1.5 million SNPs from three human populations, and present an algorithm that identifies genomic regions containing SNPs with extreme Fst. We demonstrate that our candidate regions have reduced heterozygosity in Europeans and Chinese relative to African-Americans, and are likely enriched with genes that have experienced positive natural selection. We identify genes that are likely responsible for phenotypes known to differ dramatically between human populations and present several candidates worthy of future investigation. Our list of high Fst genomic regions is a first step in identifying the genetic variants that contribute to large phenotypic differences between populations, many of which have likely experienced positive natural selection. Our approach based on between population differences can compliment traditional within population linkage and association studies to uncover novel genotype-phenotype relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18184145     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2007.00390.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Genet        ISSN: 0003-4800            Impact factor:   1.670


  35 in total

1.  OPRM1 and EGFR contribute to skin pigmentation differences between Indigenous Americans and Europeans.

Authors:  Ellen E Quillen; Marc Bauchet; Abigail W Bigham; Miguel E Delgado-Burbano; Franz X Faust; Yann C Klimentidis; Xianyun Mao; Mark Stoneking; Mark D Shriver
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Adaptations to new environments in humans: the role of subtle allele frequency shifts.

Authors:  Angela M Hancock; Gorka Alkorta-Aranburu; David B Witonsky; Anna Di Rienzo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A genome-wide scan for evidence of selection in a maize population under long-term artificial selection for ear number.

Authors:  Timothy M Beissinger; Candice N Hirsch; Brieanne Vaillancourt; Shweta Deshpande; Kerrie Barry; C Robin Buell; Shawn M Kaeppler; Daniel Gianola; Natalia de Leon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  How culture shaped the human genome: bringing genetics and the human sciences together.

Authors:  Kevin N Laland; John Odling-Smee; Sean Myles
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  African genetic diversity: implications for human demographic history, modern human origins, and complex disease mapping.

Authors:  Michael C Campbell; Sarah A Tishkoff
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.929

6.  A strategy for analyzing gene-nutrient interactions in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Carolyn Wise; Jim Kaput
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

7.  Limited evidence for classic selective sweeps in African populations.

Authors:  Julie M Granka; Brenna M Henn; Christopher R Gignoux; Jeffrey M Kidd; Carlos D Bustamante; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Detecting signatures of selection through haplotype differentiation among hierarchically structured populations.

Authors:  María Inés Fariello; Simon Boitard; Hugo Naya; Magali SanCristobal; Bertrand Servin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Enhanced Edar signalling has pleiotropic effects on craniofacial and cutaneous glands.

Authors:  Shie Hong Chang; Stephanie Jobling; Keith Brennan; Denis J Headon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An assessment of the portability of ancestry informative markers between human populations.

Authors:  Sean Myles; Mark Stoneking; Nic Timpson
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.