Literature DB >> 18183024

Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops--what makes sense?

Richard E Goodman1, Stefan Vieths, Hugh A Sampson, David Hill, Motohiro Ebisawa, Steve L Taylor, Ronald van Ree.   

Abstract

GM crops have great potential to improve food quality, increase harvest yields and decrease dependency on certain chemical pesticides. Before entering the market their safety needs to be scrutinized. This includes a detailed analysis of allergenic risks, as the safety of allergic consumers has high priority. However, not all tests currently being applied to assessing allergenicity have a sound scientific basis. Recent events with transgenic crops reveal the fallacy of applying such tests to GM crops.

Mesh：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18183024     DOI： 10.1038/nbt1343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN： 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  24 in total

1.  Distinguishing allergens from non-allergenic homologues using Physical-Chemical Property (PCP) motifs.

Authors:  Wenzhe Lu; Surendra S Negi; Catherine H Schein; Soheila J Maleki; Barry K Hurlburt; Werner Braun
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 4.407

2.  Transgenic salmon: a final leap to the grocery shelf?

Authors:  Alison L Van Eenennaam; William M Muir
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Evaluating pH-induced gastrointestinal aggregation of Arachis hypogaea 1 fragments as potential components of peanut allergy.

Authors:  I John Khan; Rong Di; Priyesh Patel; Vikas Nanda
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 4.  Strategies to query and display allergy-derived epitope data from the immune epitope database.

Authors:  Kerrie Vaughan; Bjoern Peters; Mark Larche; Anna Pomes; David Broide; Alessandro Sette
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.749

5.  Immunological and metabolomic impacts of administration of Cry1Ab protein and MON 810 maize in mouse.

Authors:  Karine Adel-Patient; Valeria D Guimaraes; Alain Paris; Marie-Françoise Drumare; Sandrine Ah-Leung; Patricia Lamourette; Marie-Claire Nevers; Cécile Canlet; Jérôme Molina; Hervé Bernard; Christophe Créminon; Jean-Michel Wal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Suggested improvements for the allergenicity assessment of genetically modified plants used in foods.

Authors:  Richard E Goodman; Afua O Tetteh
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.806

7.  The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: a foundation for examining variability in elicitation thresholds for food allergens.

Authors:  Steve L Taylor; Steven M Gendel; Geert F Houben; Elizabeth Julien
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

8.  Value of eight-amino-acid matches in predicting the allergenicity status of proteins: an empirical bioinformatic investigation.

Authors:  Rod A Herman; Ping Song; Arvind Thirumalaiswamysekhar
Journal:  Clin Mol Allergy       Date:  2009-10-29

Review 9.  A Comprehensive Overview on the Production of Vaccines in Plant-Based Expression Systems and the Scope of Plant Biotechnology to Combat against SARS-CoV-2 Virus Pandemics.

Authors:  Manu Kumar; Nisha Kumari; Nishant Thakur; Shashi Kant Bhatia; Ganesh Dattatraya Saratale; Gajanan Ghodake; Bhupendra M Mistry; Hemasundar Alavilli; D S Kishor; Xueshi Du; Sang-Min Chung
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-15

10.  Environmental effects on allergen levels in commercially grown non-genetically modified soybeans: assessing variation across north america.

Authors:  Severin E Stevenson; Carlotta A Woods; Bonnie Hong; Xiaoxiao Kong; Jay J Thelen; Gregory S Ladics
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 5.753
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.