Literature DB >> 18182684

Adapting IMRT delivery fraction-by-fraction to cater for variable intrafraction motion.

S Webb1.   

Abstract

This paper presents a technique for coping with variable intrafraction organ motion when delivering intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The strategy is an adaptive delivery in which the fluence delivered up to a particular fraction is subtracted from the required total-course planned fluence to create an adapted residual fluence for the next fraction. This requires that the fluence already delivered can be computed, knowing the intrafraction motion during each fraction. If the adaptation is unconstrained, as would be required for perfect delivery of the planned fluence, then the individual fractional fluences would become unphysical, with both negative components and spikes. Hence it is argued that constraints must be applied; first, positivity constraints and second, constraints to limit fluence spikes. Additionally, it is shown to be helpful to constrain other quantities which are explained. The power of the strategy is that it adapts to the (potentially variable) moving geometry during each fraction. It is not a perfect delivery but it is always better than making no adaptation. The fractionated nature of radiation therapy is thus exploited to advantage. The fluence adaptation method does not require re-planning at each fraction but this imposes limitations which are stated. The fuller theory of dose adaptation is also developed for intrafraction motion. The method is complementary to other adaptive strategies recently discussed with respect to interfraction motion.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18182684     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/1/001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  The use of EPID-measured leaf sequence files for IMRT dose reconstruction in adaptive radiation therapy.

Authors:  Louis Lee; Weihua Mao; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Direct dose mapping versus energy/mass transfer mapping for 4D dose accumulation: fundamental differences and dosimetric consequences.

Authors:  Haisen S Li; Hualiang Zhong; Jinkoo Kim; Carri Glide-Hurst; Misbah Gulam; Teamour S Nurushev; Indrin J Chetty
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The perils of adapting to dose errors in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Velibor V Mišić; Timothy C Y Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Magnitude, Impact, and Management of Respiration-induced Target Motion in Radiotherapy Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  S A Yoganathan; K J Maria Das; Arpita Agarwal; Shaleen Kumar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.